TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13103296
Played Sep 10Finished
Radomir Revay
Home
1.50
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
1012611115119114
Jakub Pilch
Away
2.50
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:37 and never touched — 65.4% is still 65.4%
Graded at full timeRadomir Revay to win
65.4%
65.4%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
90 points played in total.
Set by set
1012611115119114
H2H Radomir Revay 13–4 Jakub Pilch Jakub Pilch has won 4 of their 17 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 09:37What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.50 (63%)
Revay
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
13-4 in 17
Revay
Correct
gap of 9 in 17, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Revay 1831 vs Pilch 1803
Revay
Correct
both rated, 28 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Revay 40% vs Pilch 20%
Revay
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Revay 50% vs Pilch 30%
Revay
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Revay +1 · Pilch -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 64% — Clear lean (leans Revay) · live re-read · sealed at 65% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Pilch form (20%) is below what odds imply (40%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsRevay 1.50 / Pilch 2.50
Signal prob.64% / 36%
Edge (Revay)+1.6pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13103296
Revay1.50
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As favourite56% won 97 of 173
Up 2–0, closes it95% 40 of 42
Up 1–0, closes it71% 67 of 95
Pilch2.50
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog46% won 33 of 72
Down 0–1, comes back30% 11 of 37
Down 0–2, comes back6% 1 of 18
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeRevay8wins
AwayPilch2wins
2 of 10 to a deciderRevay leads 8–2, and 2 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeRevay71.4%5 of 7
AwayPilch0%0 of 3
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Revay7Pilch3n = 10Revay took 7 of 10
S2Revay5Pilch5n = 10split evenly
S3Revay7Pilch3n = 10Revay took 7 of 10
S4Revay5Pilch3n = 8Revay took 5 of 8
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home220%
3–1Four sets, home440%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricRevayPilchR − PBasisWins82+6in 10 meetingsFirst set73+4of 10Avg pointsper match40.633.6+7.0per matchSweeps20+23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricRevayPilchBasisWin rate · lifetime295 / 570 vs 218 / 43351.8%50.4%295 / 570 vs 218 / 433Avg sets wonper match2.12.0per matchAvg pointsper match39.637.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
RevayRevay 1.50/Pilch 2.50
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
64.1%
Revay · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Revay won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 10 · 06:30R. Revay—1061111113J. Pilch—12115942
LJul 24 · 07:30R. Revay—1167111J. Pilch—41111133
WJun 15 · 11:00R. Revay—1117113J. Pilch—51590
WJun 15 · 09:28R. Revay—115117113J. Pilch—51171172
WJun 15 · 07:00R. Revay—91111113J. Pilch—115851
WMay 1 · 13:00R. Revay—71111113J. Pilch—119681
LMay 1 · 12:30R. Revay—1310961J. Pilch—111211113
WApr 30 · 15:00R. Revay—11911113J. Pilch—611971
WApr 27 · 07:30R. Revay—11119113J. Pilch—141191
WJan 29 · 09:57R. Revay—1112113J. Pilch—41060
R. Revay10
WSep 10 · 09:30J. Pilch2.384860R. Revay1.531111113WSep 10 · 08:00M. Vavrecka1.739101171R. Revay2.0011126113LSep 10 · 07:00M. Navedla1.83611128113R. Revay1.83118101182WSep 9 · 09:04R. Revay1.921111512123M. Vavrecka1.78491114102LSep 9 · 08:30O. Paril1.73116128123R. Revay2.007111011102WSep 9 · 07:30R. Revay2.0011711113M. Vavrecka1.73711671LSep 9 · 06:30R. Polasek1.8311117123R. Revay1.838711101LSep 4 · 13:30R. Revay1.908460P. Wawrosz1.801111113WSep 4 · 12:00R. Revay1.9181111133M. Navedla1.801186111WSep 4 · 11:30P. Wawrosz1.8011711992R. Revay1.91611411113
J. Pilch10
LSep 10 · 11:30J. Pilch2.251151381R. Polasek1.5741115113WSep 10 · 10:30M. Navedla2.007460J. Pilch1.731111113LSep 10 · 09:30J. Pilch2.384860R. Revay1.531111113WSep 10 · 08:30M. Navedla2.0081090J. Pilch1.731112113WSep 10 · 07:30J. Pilch2.001361111113M. Vavrecka1.73111181342LSep 8 · 08:58J. Pilch1.8091190M. Navedla1.911113113WSep 8 · 08:30J. Pilch1.80811711113M. Navedla1.9111511952LSep 8 · 07:00J. Pilch1.73551171P. Wawrosz2.0011116113LSep 8 · 06:00R. Polasek1.57111175113J. Pilch2.2576111132LSep 7 · 13:07J. Pilch1.72117271P. Wawrosz2.0041111113
Upcoming Matches
R. Revay2 of 2 neutral
J. Pilch
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.