TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13099471
Played Sep 9Finished
Michal Machelski
Home
2.11
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
2–8Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
1197111210711115
Kamil Delikatny
Away
1.66
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 15:31 and never touched — 55.8% is still 55.8%
Graded at full timeKamil Delikatny to win
55.8%
55.8%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
94 points played in total.
Set by set
1197111210711115
H2H Michal Machelski 12–15 Kamil Delikatny Michal Machelski has won 12 of their 27 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 15:31What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.66 (56%)
Delikatny
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
12-15 in 27
Delikatny
Wrong
gap of 3 in 27, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Machelski 1289 vs Delikatny 1360
Delikatny
Wrong
both rated, 71 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Machelski 40% vs Delikatny 60%
Delikatny
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Machelski 20% vs Delikatny 30%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Machelski +1 · Delikatny +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 56% — Slight lean (leans Delikatny) · live re-read · sealed at 56% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsMachelski 2.11 / Delikatny 1.66
Signal prob.44% / 56%
Edge (Delikatny)+0.4pp
TT Elite Series · #13099471
Machelski2.11
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog33% won 118 of 358
Down 0–1, comes back17% 36 of 207
Down 0–2, comes back2% 2 of 124
Delikatny1.66
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As favourite62% won 55 of 89
Up 2–0, closes it100% 28 of 28
Up 1–0, closes it82% 40 of 49
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeMachelski2wins
AwayDelikatny8wins
2 of 10 to a deciderDelikatny leads 8–2, and 2 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeMachelski66.7%2 of 3
AwayDelikatny100%7 of 7
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Machelski3Delikatny7n = 10Delikatny took 7 of 10
S2Machelski4Delikatny6n = 10Delikatny took 6 of 10
S3Machelski4Delikatny6n = 10Delikatny took 6 of 10
S4Machelski1Delikatny3n = 4Delikatny took 3 of 4
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home220%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away440%
These 10 meetings
MetricMachelskiDelikatnyM − DBasisWins28−6in 10 meetingsFirst set37−4of 10Avg pointsper match31.235.8−4.6per matchSweeps24−23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricMachelskiDelikatnyBasisWin rate · lifetime422 / 1144 vs 227 / 47236.9%48.1%422 / 1144 vs 227 / 472Avg sets wonper match1.71.9per matchAvg pointsper match35.234.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
DelikatnyMachelski 2.11/Delikatny 1.66
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
56.4%
Delikatny · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Machelski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LAug 13 · 02:15M. Machelski—11970K. Delikatny—1311113
LAug 12 · 18:20M. Machelski—10660K. Delikatny—1211113
LAug 6 · 24:20M. Machelski—611881K. Delikatny—11511113
LAug 5 · 20:20M. Machelski—611771K. Delikatny—11711113
LJul 29 · 21:45M. Machelski—4780K. Delikatny—1111113
WJul 29 · 17:45M. Machelski—1111143K. Delikatny—58120
LJun 12 · 02:20M. Machelski—12580K. Delikatny—1411113
LApr 24 · 01:50M. Machelski—37111172K. Delikatny—111169113
LApr 10 · 02:50M. Machelski—111111442K. Delikatny—513611113
WMar 20 · 01:45M. Machelski—1711113K. Delikatny—15440
M. Machelski10
WSep 9 · 01:55M. Machelski1.281311113A. Barton3.1511690LSep 9 · 24:45H. Tkaczyk1.221111113M. Machelski3.558640LSep 8 · 23:55M. Machelski1.96115118122A. Krezel1.69211711143LSep 8 · 02:20M. Machelski1.868860A. Krezel1.801111113WSep 8 · 24:45M. Karpiuk1.80146118112M. Machelski1.911211711133LSep 8 · 24:00J. Michalik1.601111113M. Machelski2.107750LSep 7 · 23:10M. Machelski1.9516150A. Staniczek1.751811113LSep 7 · 22:00M. Machelski3.656670M. Warzecha1.211111113LSep 7 · 08:00J. Slawomir1.6511711113M. Machelski2.10811591LSep 7 · 07:10A. Zmijewski1.4541111113M. Machelski2.50113841
K. Delikatny10
WSep 9 · 02:20H. Tkaczyk1.328670K. Delikatny2.901111113LSep 9 · 01:30K. Delikatny1.698570A. Krezel1.961111113WSep 9 · 24:20K. Delikatny1.7751111113M. Brunner1.87116391LSep 8 · 22:40K. Delikatny1.326720A. Barton3.051111113WSep 8 · 21:05J. Michalik1.851012731K. Delikatny1.85121011113LSep 8 · 20:20M. Brunner1.901211113K. Delikatny1.8010460LSep 8 · 19:30K. Delikatny1.80133381A. Krezel1.85111111113LSep 8 · 18:20K. Delikatny3.0010650H. Tkaczyk1.331211113LAug 14 · 04:40K. Delikatny1.894790J. Cyndera1.781111113LAug 14 · 03:05A. Staniczek1.9511117113K. Delikatny1.75881161
Upcoming Matches
M. Machelski
K. Delikatny1 of 2 neutral
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.