TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup
Setka CupMatch #13055126
Played Sep 1Finished
Adam Radkovsky
Home
2.10
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
117116116––––
Lukas Rulc
Away
1.67
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:07 and never touched — 55.8% is still 55.8%
Graded at full timeLukas Rulc to win
55.8%
55.8%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingAdam Radkovsky above · Lukas Rulc below
Set 1 · 11-7
Set 2 · 11-6
Set 3 · 11-6
Point 52 set 3, 11-6 — our read held Lukas Rulc at 55.8%
52 points played in total.
H2H Adam Radkovsky 0–1 Lukas Rulc Adam Radkovsky has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 20:07What took a side1 for · 1 against · 4 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.67 (56%)
Rulc
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-1 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Radkovsky 1669 vs Rulc 1606
Radkovsky
Correct
both rated, 63 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Radkovsky 20% vs Rulc 20%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Radkovsky 40% vs Rulc 40%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Radkovsky +1 · Rulc -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 4 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 56% — Slight lean (leans Rulc)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Rulc form (20%) is below what odds imply (60%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsRadkovsky 2.10 / Rulc 1.67
Signal prob.44% / 56%
Edge (Rulc)+0.0pp
Setka Cup · #13055126
Radkovsky2.10
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog50% won 32 of 64
Down 0–1, comes back30% 7 of 23
Down 0–2, comes back17% 2 of 12
Rulc1.67
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite56% won 106 of 188
Up 2–0, closes it85% 46 of 54
Up 1–0, closes it69% 75 of 108
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomeRadkovsky0wins
AwayRulc1wins
1 of 1 to a deciderRulc leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away1
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away0
This 1 meeting
MetricRadkovskyRulcRadkovsky − RulcBasisWins01−1in 1 meetingFirst set10+1of 1Avg pointsper match45.052.0−7.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricRadkovskyRulcBasisWin rate · lifetime174 / 304 vs 349 / 70457.2%49.6%174 / 304 vs 349 / 704Avg sets wonper match2.32.1per matchAvg pointsper match40.339.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
RulcRadkovsky 2.10/Rulc 1.67
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
55.8%
Rulc · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Radkovsky won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
LJul 26 · 15:43A. Radkovsky—13861172L. Rulc—1111118113
A. Radkovsky10
WSep 3 · 16:48S. Rejent1.504640A. Radkovsky2.501111113WSep 3 · 15:15A. Radkovsky2.001191111113J. Sr1.7381191392LSep 3 · 14:15A. Radkovsky2.2059100S. Rejent1.611111123WSep 3 · 13:15A. Radkovsky1.671111113O. Mezera2.106660WSep 2 · 12:13A. Radkovsky2.1011191217113V. Grubr1.67817141992LSep 2 · 11:45J. Dolezal1.5311511133A. Radkovsky2.388116111LSep 2 · 10:45M. Vyskocil1.671111113A. Radkovsky2.108560WSep 2 · 09:15V. Grubr1.61691181A. Radkovsky2.2011117113LSep 1 · 12:23T. Liska1.5391111123A. Radkovsky2.381176101LSep 1 · 11:15V. Grubr1.67611511113A. Radkovsky2.1011611792
L. Rulc10
LSep 1 · 12:54L. Rulc1.831111810102V. Grubr1.83881112123WSep 1 · 11:45L. Rulc1.67121189123T. Liska2.101041111102WSep 1 · 10:15V. Grubr1.834116101L. Rulc1.8311511123LAug 31 · 12:48M. Kocvara2.631111113L. Rulc1.447870WAug 31 · 11:45L. Rulc1.6711711113M. Kocvara2.10811671LAug 31 · 10:15M. Stibor1.501161111123L. Rulc2.50131197102LAug 31 · 09:45M. Vyskocil2.75139114113L. Rulc1.40111181132LAug 29 · 13:05M. Makara1.801512113L. Rulc1.91131090WAug 29 · 12:00L. Rulc1.91118911113M. Makara1.8091111662WAug 29 · 10:30T. Liska2.2511981142L. Rulc1.57911119113
Upcoming Matches
A. Radkovsky
L. Rulc
Nothing scheduled
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.