Lukas Zeman vs Martin Huk 1-3

TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro

Czech Liga ProMatch #13051676

Played Sep 1Finished

Lukas Zeman

Home

1.57

At publish

Lost last 2

Form at publish

4–6Last 10Lost last 2

Final

1 – 3

Set by set

7111178111012––

Martin Huk

Away

2.25

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

5–5Last 10Won last 1

The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:35 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%

Graded at full time

Martin Huk to win

54.0%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

no pick shipped

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.

How it is goingLukas Zeman above · Martin Huk below

Set 1 · 7-11

Set 2 · 11-7

Set 3 · 8-11

Set 4 · 10-12

Point 77 set 4, 10-12 — our read held Martin Huk at 54.0%

77 points played in total.

H2H Lukas Zeman 21–18 Martin Huk Martin Huk has won 18 of their 39 meetings.

Last 10 · 5–5Head to head

The pickNo pick published

Sealed 09:35

What took a side0 for · 3 against · 3 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.57 (59%)

Zeman

Wrong

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

21-18 in 39

Zeman

Wrong

gap of 3 in 39, over the gap of 2

Rating (G2)

Zeman 1802 vs Huk 1770

Zeman

Wrong

both rated, 32 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Zeman 40% vs Huk 40%

—

Too close

0pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Zeman 40% vs Huk 50%

—

Too close

10pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Streak

Zeman -2 · Huk +1

—

Too close

neither holds a run of 3 on their own

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

0 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 60% — Slight lean (leans Zeman) · live re-read · sealed at 46% before the first serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Zeman form (40%) is below what odds imply (64%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsZeman 1.57 / Huk 2.25

Signal prob.60% / 40%

Edge (Zeman)+0.8pp

Czech Liga Pro · #13051676

Zeman1.57

40%won 4 of 10 · last 10

Lost last 2

oldest → newest

40%takes the first set · 4 of 10

As favourite56% won 42 of 75

Up 2–0, closes it96% 23 of 24

Up 1–0, closes it79% 34 of 43

Huk2.25

50%won 5 of 10 · last 10

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

As underdog41% won 134 of 324

Down 0–1, comes back24% 40 of 168

Down 0–2, comes back7% 6 of 86

Head to head

H2H window

The recordacross 10 meetings

HomeZeman5wins

AwayHuk5wins

3 of 10 to a deciderLevel at 5–5, and 3 of those 10 went to a fifth set.

First set to match win · in this matchup

HomeZeman75%3 of 4

AwayHuk66.7%4 of 6

Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one

S1Zeman4Huk6n = 10Huk took 6 of 10

S2Zeman7Huk3n = 10Zeman took 7 of 10

S3Zeman6Huk4n = 10Zeman took 6 of 10

S4Zeman4Huk4n = 8split evenly

S5Zeman1Huk2n = 3Huk took 2 of 3

How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code

3–0Straight, home220%

3–1Four sets, home220%

3–2Decider, home110%

2–3Decider, away220%

1–3Four sets, away330%

0–3Straight, away00%

These 10 meetings

MetricZemanHukZ − HBasisWins550in 10 meetingsFirst set46−2of 10Avg pointsper match42.036.6+5.4per matchSweeps20+23–0 or 0–3

Career, not this matchup

MetricZemanHukBasisWin rate · lifetime257 / 518 vs 813 / 165949.6%49%257 / 518 vs 813 / 1659Avg sets wonper match2.02.0per matchAvg pointsper match39.438.5per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Zeman

Zeman 1.57/Huk 2.25

Read onlywould have missed

What we said

59.7%

Zeman · sealed before the serve

What happened

1–3

Huk won

Recent Results

H2H · no odds on record10

WApr 25 · 22:00L. Zeman—1111119113M. Huk—13561192

WApr 11 · 20:00L. Zeman—11911113M. Huk—711571

LApr 3 · 10:00L. Zeman—1211861M. Huk—14411113

WApr 2 · 20:30L. Zeman—1111113M. Huk—3880

LFeb 22 · 22:30L. Zeman—11910111M. Huk—71112133

LFeb 22 · 19:30L. Zeman—891212122M. Huk—11111010143

WJan 15 · 03:00L. Zeman—61111113M. Huk—114491

WJan 14 · 10:30L. Zeman—1111113M. Huk—7690

LJan 14 · 07:00L. Zeman—12119101M. Huk—14511123

LJan 12 · 07:30L. Zeman—91181182M. Huk—115114113

L. Zeman10

LSep 2 · 03:00L. Zeman1.73891251J. Kycelt2.00111110113 LSep 2 · 02:30E. Mares1.80111311113L. Zeman1.91715881 WSep 2 · 01:00F. Wolf2.00118813102L. Zeman1.739111111123 WSep 1 · 23:30L. Zeman1.7310111011123J. Kycelt2.00126125102 LAug 16 · 13:29J. Cernik1.369111011113L. Zeman3.0011912482 LAug 16 · 12:00J. Cernik1.3611911113L. Zeman3.00811481 WAug 16 · 11:00M. Kratochvil2.10561281L. Zeman1.67111110113 WAug 16 · 10:30L. Zeman1.83911611113J. Kanera1.8311911942 LAug 15 · 16:59L. Zeman1.5761180M. Kratochvil2.251113113 LAug 15 · 16:00E. Mares1.8311916113L. Zeman1.837111491

M. Huk10

WSep 3 · 13:29M. Zahradka1.6110131081M. Huk2.20121112113 WSep 3 · 12:30M. Huk1.8312119113J. Ruzicka1.831071191 LSep 3 · 11:00M. Huk1.91711561M. Zahradka1.8011911113 WSep 3 · 10:00E. Mares1.4461114662M. Huk2.631151211113 LSep 3 · 09:28M. Zahradka1.801111113M. Huk1.915750 LSep 3 · 08:00M. Zahradka1.73511114123M. Huk2.00118711102 WSep 3 · 07:00M. Klimenta1.80118681M. Huk1.9141111113 WSep 3 · 06:30M. Huk1.801171011113J. Ruzicka1.9161112772 WSep 2 · 21:28J. Kycelt1.50116871M. Huk2.5041111113 WSep 2 · 20:30M. Huk1.83118116113J. Ruzicka1.8331181152

Event Chatroom

This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.