TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13045915
Played Aug 30Finished
Adrian Eliasz
Home
1.49
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
1113411119611––
Miroslaw Piecowski
Away
2.45
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 04:16 and never touched — 69.2% is still 69.2%
Graded at full timeAdrian Eliasz to win
69.2%
69.2%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
76 points played in total.
Set by set
1113411119611––
H2H Adrian Eliasz 7–4 Miroslaw Piecowski Miroslaw Piecowski has won 4 of their 11 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 04:16What took a side4 for · 1 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.49 (62%)
Eliasz
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
7-4 in 11
Eliasz
Wrong
gap of 3 in 11, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Eliasz 1191 vs Piecowski 1238
Piecowski
Correct
both rated, 48 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Eliasz 60% vs Piecowski 40%
Eliasz
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Eliasz 50% vs Piecowski 30%
Eliasz
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Eliasz -1 · Piecowski -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 63% — Clear lean (leans Eliasz) · live re-read · sealed at 69% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsEliasz 1.49 / Piecowski 2.45
Signal prob.63% / 37%
Edge (Eliasz)+0.4pp
TT Elite Series · #13045915
Eliasz1.49
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite50% won 71 of 141
Up 2–0, closes it94% 29 of 31
Up 1–0, closes it67% 49 of 73
Piecowski2.45
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog42% won 115 of 272
Down 0–1, comes back25% 37 of 146
Down 0–2, comes back5% 4 of 75
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeEliasz6wins
AwayPiecowski4wins
3 of 10 to a deciderEliasz leads 6–4, and 3 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeEliasz100%5 of 5
AwayPiecowski80%4 of 5
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Eliasz5Piecowski5n = 10split evenly
S2Eliasz8Piecowski2n = 10Eliasz took 8 of 10
S3Eliasz7Piecowski3n = 10Eliasz took 7 of 10
S4Eliasz3Piecowski4n = 7Piecowski took 4 of 7
S5Eliasz1Piecowski2n = 3Piecowski took 2 of 3
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home330%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home110%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricEliaszPiecowskiE − PBasisWins64+2in 10 meetingsFirst set550of 10Avg pointsper match37.934.6+3.3per matchSweeps30+33–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricEliaszPiecowskiBasisWin rate · lifetime359 / 961 vs 513 / 115637.4%44.4%359 / 961 vs 513 / 1156Avg sets wonper match1.71.9per matchAvg pointsper match36.938.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
EliaszEliasz 1.49/Piecowski 2.45
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
62.6%
Eliasz · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Piecowski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LAug 30 · 09:25A. Eliasz—81111582M. Piecowski—115911113
LAug 30 · 06:55A. Eliasz—1141161M. Piecowski—13119113
LAug 3 · 21:30A. Eliasz—101111762M. Piecowski—128811113
LAug 3 · 17:45A. Eliasz—7119101M. Piecowski—11811123
WApr 19 · 13:55A. Eliasz—1211113M. Piecowski—10690
WMar 30 · 01:25A. Eliasz—511711113M. Piecowski—11411382
WMar 29 · 22:50A. Eliasz—12211113M. Piecowski—1011571
WMar 22 · 16:30A. Eliasz—1111113M. Piecowski—7470
WMar 15 · 04:25A. Eliasz—1111113M. Piecowski—8780
WMar 8 · 19:15A. Eliasz—11118113M. Piecowski—571141
A. Eliasz10
WAug 30 · 13:55A. Eliasz2.20117911113M. Sinicki1.5791111982LAug 30 · 12:40A. Eliasz1.9181311882B. Wisniewski1.781111811113LAug 30 · 11:25A. Eliasz1.7811691272K. Marchlewski1.937111110113LAug 30 · 10:10M. Piecowski1.55117119113A. Eliasz2.2571191192LAug 30 · 09:25A. Eliasz1.4781111582M. Piecowski2.45115911113LAug 30 · 08:35A. Eliasz1.86791291B. Wisniewski1.83111110113LAug 30 · 05:40A. Eliasz2.10117991M. Piecowski1.6581111113WAug 30 · 04:10A. Eliasz1.83111147113M. Lukaszewski1.8357111182WAug 30 · 03:00A. Eliasz1.851111113K. Marchlewski1.855680LAug 29 · 24:35K. Klocek1.601111113A. Eliasz2.102240
M. Piecowski10
LSep 3 · 24:10M. Piecowski1.34111578113M. Piecowski2.90713111192LSep 2 · 23:45M. Piecowski1.83611591K. Marchlewski1.8611411113WSep 2 · 22:55M. Piecowski1.7581111113W. Gluszek1.95118371WSep 2 · 21:05M. Piecowski1.9081111113M. Kowalczyk1.75119861WSep 2 · 20:05W. Gluszek2.105750M. Piecowski1.601111113LSep 2 · 19:20M. Kowalczyk1.7411118113M. Piecowski1.95241141LSep 2 · 17:20K. Marchlewski1.71117118113M. Piecowski1.9841191182WSep 2 · 16:35P. Strus1.6761114452M. Piecowski2.031191211113WSep 2 · 15:00M. Piecowski1.471112991M. Piecowski2.45131011113WAug 30 · 09:25A. Eliasz1.4781111582M. Piecowski2.45115911113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.