TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13066404
Played Sep 2Finished
Wojciech Gluszek
Home
2.10
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Won last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
511711511––––
Miroslaw Piecowski
Away
1.60
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 17:30 and never touched — 54.8% is still 54.8%
Graded at full timeMiroslaw Piecowski to win
54.8%
54.8%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
50 points played in total.
Set by set
511711511––––
H2H Wojciech Gluszek 18–16 Miroslaw Piecowski Miroslaw Piecowski has won 16 of their 34 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 17:30What took a side2 for · 2 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.60 (57%)
Piecowski
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
18-16 in 34
Gluszek
Wrong
gap of 2 in 34, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Gluszek 1252 vs Piecowski 1240
Gluszek
Wrong
both rated, 12 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Gluszek 60% vs Piecowski 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Gluszek 40% vs Piecowski 60%
Piecowski
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Gluszek +1 · Piecowski -2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 58% — Slight lean (leans Piecowski) · live re-read · sealed at 55% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Gluszek form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (48%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsGluszek 2.10 / Piecowski 1.60
Signal prob.42% / 58%
Edge (Piecowski)+0.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13066404
Gluszek2.10
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog35% won 117 of 331
Down 0–1, comes back18% 33 of 187
Down 0–2, comes back4% 5 of 116
Piecowski1.60
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite51% won 65 of 128
Up 2–0, closes it88% 30 of 34
Up 1–0, closes it71% 49 of 69
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeGluszek4wins
AwayPiecowski6wins
3 of 10 to a deciderPiecowski leads 6–4, and 3 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeGluszekn = 0, below the 3 needed
AwayPiecowski60%6 of 10
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Gluszek0Piecowski10n = 10Piecowski took 10 of 10
S2Gluszek5Piecowski5n = 10split evenly
S3Gluszek4Piecowski6n = 10Piecowski took 6 of 10
S4Gluszek3Piecowski4n = 7Piecowski took 4 of 7
S5Gluszek3Piecowski0n = 3Gluszek took 3 of 3
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home110%
3–2Decider, home330%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away330%
0–3Straight, away330%
These 10 meetings
MetricGluszekPiecowskiG − PBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set010−10of 10Avg pointsper match33.941.7−7.8per matchSweeps03−33–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricGluszekPiecowskiBasisWin rate · lifetime865 / 1818 vs 515 / 116047.6%44.4%865 / 1818 vs 515 / 1160Avg sets wonper match1.91.9per matchAvg pointsper match36.538.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
PiecowskiGluszek 2.10/Piecowski 1.60
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
57.6%
Piecowski · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Piecowski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LAug 17 · 17:45W. Gluszek—811291M. Piecowski—11911113
WAug 3 · 21:55W. Gluszek—5111112113M. Piecowski—11971482
LJul 27 · 09:00W. Gluszek—7580M. Piecowski—1111113
LJul 27 · 08:10W. Gluszek—611591M. Piecowski—11911113
WJul 20 · 17:45W. Gluszek—411614113M. Piecowski—118111282
WJul 14 · 01:00W. Gluszek—21715113M. Piecowski—11151391
LJul 13 · 22:35W. Gluszek—871181M. Piecowski—11119113
LJul 13 · 20:30W. Gluszek—9460M. Piecowski—1111113
LJun 3 · 10:05W. Gluszek—71030M. Piecowski—1112113
WMay 5 · 11:45W. Gluszek—471111113M. Piecowski—11118592
W. Gluszek10
WSep 4 · 24:10M. Trela1.859870W. Gluszek1.851111113WSep 3 · 23:45W. Gluszek1.861611113113K. Golaszewski1.8018881172WSep 3 · 22:55W. Gluszek2.15118114123K. Sulkowski1.63911911102WSep 3 · 21:05W. Gluszek1.8011117113J. Rolak1.90961191WSep 3 · 20:05K. Sulkowski1.55127661W. Gluszek2.25101111113WSep 3 · 19:20J. Rolak1.5210630W. Gluszek2.351211113LSep 3 · 17:20M. Kowalczyk1.751111113W. Gluszek1.904460LSep 3 · 16:35K. Golaszewski1.791111113W. Gluszek1.885890LSep 3 · 15:00M. Trela1.8531111113W. Gluszek1.80118841LSep 3 · 24:35K. Marchlewski2.001111113W. Gluszek1.718980
M. Piecowski10
LSep 3 · 24:10M. Piecowski1.34111578113M. Piecowski2.90713111192LSep 2 · 23:45M. Piecowski1.83611591K. Marchlewski1.8611411113WSep 2 · 22:55M. Piecowski1.7581111113W. Gluszek1.95118371WSep 2 · 21:05M. Piecowski1.9081111113M. Kowalczyk1.75119861LSep 2 · 19:20M. Kowalczyk1.7411118113M. Piecowski1.95241141LSep 2 · 17:20K. Marchlewski1.71117118113M. Piecowski1.9841191182WSep 2 · 16:35P. Strus1.6761114452M. Piecowski2.031191211113WSep 2 · 15:00M. Piecowski1.471112991M. Piecowski2.45131011113WSep 1 · 24:10B. Wisniewski1.603950M. Piecowski2.151111113LAug 31 · 23:45M. Piecowski1.9811116972B. Mrugala1.73991111113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.