TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13041123
Played Aug 30Finished
Ladislav Havel 1956
Home
2.75
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
7111315119611––
Martin Tacinec
Away
1.40
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 10:40 and never touched — 58.3% is still 58.3%
Graded at full timeMartin Tacinec to win
58.3%
58.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingLadislav Havel 1956 above · Martin Tacinec below
Set 1 · 7-11
Set 2 · 13-15
Set 3 · 11-9
Set 4 · 6-11
Point 83 set 4, 6-11 — our read held Martin Tacinec at 58.3%
83 points played in total.
H2H Ladislav Havel 1956 4–13 Martin Tacinec Ladislav Havel 1956 has won 4 of their 17 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 10:40What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.40 (66%)
Tacinec
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
4-13 in 17
Tacinec
Correct
gap of 9 in 17, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Havel 1306 vs Tacinec 1425
Tacinec
Correct
both rated, 118 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Havel 40% vs Tacinec 80%
Tacinec
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Havel 60% vs Tacinec 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Havel +1 · Tacinec +4
Tacinec
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 71% — Strong (leans Tacinec) · live re-read · sealed at 58% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsHavel 2.75 / Tacinec 1.40
Signal prob.29% / 71%
Edge (Tacinec)+4.4pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13041123
Havel2.75
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog39% won 48 of 123
Down 0–1, comes back17% 11 of 66
Down 0–2, comes back2% 1 of 45
Tacinec1.40
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite65% won 54 of 83
Up 2–0, closes it89% 23 of 26
Up 1–0, closes it88% 38 of 43
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeHavel4wins
AwayTacinec6wins
5 of 10 to a deciderTacinec leads 6–4, and 5 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeHavel60%3 of 5
AwayTacinec80%4 of 5
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Havel5Tacinec5n = 10split evenly
S2Havel3Tacinec7n = 10Tacinec took 7 of 10
S3Havel4Tacinec6n = 10Tacinec took 6 of 10
S4Havel5Tacinec2n = 7Havel took 5 of 7
S5Havel2Tacinec3n = 5Tacinec took 3 of 5
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home110%
3–1Four sets, home110%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away330%
1–3Four sets, away110%
0–3Straight, away220%
These 10 meetings
MetricHavelTacinecH − TBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set550of 10Avg pointsper match36.940.8−3.9per matchSweeps12−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricHavelTacinecBasisWin rate · lifetime278 / 580 vs 158 / 29447.9%53.7%278 / 580 vs 158 / 294Avg sets wonper match1.92.1per matchAvg pointsper match35.937.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
TacinecHavel 2.75/Tacinec 1.40
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
70.7%
Tacinec · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Tacinec won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WAug 22 · 15:30L. Havel—11511113M. Tacinec—911741
LJun 14 · 07:00L. Havel—91111192M. Tacinec—111158113
LApr 11 · 16:58L. Havel—7690M. Tacinec—1111113
LApr 11 · 15:00L. Havel—12481272M. Tacinec—10111110113
WMar 29 · 06:30L. Havel—1111113M. Tacinec—7860
LNov 23 · 07:00L. Havel—113991M. Tacinec—91111113
LNov 13 · 17:56L. Havel—54111262M. Tacinec—1111610113
WNov 13 · 16:00L. Havel—1115115113M. Tacinec—913131162
LNov 8 · 14:06L. Havel—6760M. Tacinec—1111113
WNov 8 · 11:30L. Havel—1011414113M. Tacinec—127111262
L. Havel10
LAug 31 · 09:28L. Havel1.679121071A. Svoboda2.10111012113WAug 31 · 08:30L. Havel2.10111211113Z. Zikmunda1.67714841WAug 31 · 07:00L. Havel1.801111113M. Ulrych1.918980WAug 31 · 06:00A. Svoboda1.737990L. Havel2.001111113WAug 30 · 13:00L. Havel1.801111123D. Priesol1.9169100WAug 30 · 11:00L. Havel1.9111117113D. Priesol1.80591171LAug 30 · 10:00J. Briska1.831111133L. Havel1.8395110LAug 29 · 13:30L. Sulava1.2211117133L. Havel4.007511111LAug 29 · 12:30L. Sulava1.441111113L. Havel2.636940WAug 29 · 11:30L. Havel2.1011177123D. Priesol1.6791511101
M. Tacinec10
LAug 30 · 13:29M. Tacinec1.806111310102J. Briska1.911161112123WAug 30 · 11:30M. Tacinec1.731181015113J. Briska2.00811121362WAug 30 · 10:30D. Priesol1.5361020M. Tacinec2.381112113WAug 22 · 17:30L. Sulava2.10111191192M. Tacinec1.67913113113WAug 22 · 16:00M. Tacinec1.6711911113L. Sulava2.10511571LAug 22 · 15:30L. Havel3.0011511113M. Tacinec1.36911741WAug 22 · 14:00M. Tacinec1.50111297123M. Barta2.508101111102LAug 16 · 08:59M. Tacinec2.0010970D. Barton1.731211113LAug 16 · 08:00J. Didi1.7371111113M. Tacinec2.00115881LAug 16 · 07:00D. Barton1.737111110113M. Tacinec2.0011531292
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.