TT Lossbeater/TT Cup
TT CupMatch #13011616
Played Aug 25Finished
Robert Jamrich
Home
2.00
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
611311119711––
Jan Hendrych
Away
1.73
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:47 and never touched — 56.5% is still 56.5%
Graded at full timeJan Hendrych to win
56.5%
56.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingRobert Jamrich above · Jan Hendrych below
Set 1 · 6-11
Set 2 · 3-11
Set 3 · 11-9
Set 4 · 7-11
Point 69 set 4, 7-11 — our read held Jan Hendrych at 56.5%
69 points played in total.
H2H Robert Jamrich 2–3 Jan Hendrych Robert Jamrich has won 2 of their 5 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 09:47What took a side3 for · 0 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.73 (54%)
Hendrych
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
2-3 in 5
—
Too close
gap of 1, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Jamrich 1382 vs Hendrych 1540
Hendrych
Correct
both rated, 158 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Jamrich 60% vs Hendrych 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Jamrich 30% vs Hendrych 60%
Hendrych
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Jamrich -1 · Hendrych +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 62% — Slight lean (leans Hendrych) · live re-read · sealed at 57% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsJamrich 2.00 / Hendrych 1.73
Signal prob.38% / 62%
Edge (Hendrych)+8.0pp
TT Cup · #13011616
Jamrich2.00
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog43% won 28 of 65
Down 0–1, comes back20% 7 of 35
Down 0–2, comes back8% 2 of 24
Hendrych1.73
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As favourite69% won 51 of 74
Up 2–0, closes it95% 20 of 21
Up 1–0, closes it79% 33 of 42
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 5 meetings
HomeJamrich2wins
AwayHendrych3wins
3 of 5 to a deciderHendrych leads 3–2, and 3 of those 5 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeJamrich50%2 of 4
AwayHendrychn = 1, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 5 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Jamrich4Hendrych1n = 5Jamrich took 4 of 5
S2Jamrich4Hendrych1n = 5Jamrich took 4 of 5
S3Jamrich2Hendrych3n = 5Hendrych took 3 of 5
S4Jamrich2Hendrych1n = 3Jamrich took 2 of 3
S5Jamrich0Hendrych3n = 3Hendrych took 3 of 3
How those 5 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 5 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home240%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away360%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 5 meetings
MetricJamrichHendrychJ − HBasisWins23−1in 5 meetingsFirst set41+3of 5Avg pointsper match37.437.2+0.2per matchSweeps20+23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricJamrichHendrychBasisWin rate · lifetime130 / 290 vs 270 / 53744.8%50.3%130 / 290 vs 270 / 537Avg sets wonper match1.92.0per matchAvg pointsper match37.537.9per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HendrychJamrich 2.00/Hendrych 1.73
Hit
What we said
61.7%
Hendrych · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Hendrych won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record5
WJan 16 · 16:20R. Jamrich—1111113J. Hendrych—9750
WJan 4 · 12:55R. Jamrich—1112113J. Hendrych—61080
LNov 14 · 17:20R. Jamrich—11331162J. Hendrych—911112113
LSep 25 · 08:20R. Jamrich—91171192J. Hendrych—119116113
LSep 16 · 07:25R. Jamrich—11117372J. Hendrych—791111113
R. Jamrich10
WSep 6 · 18:34R. Jamrich1.4412311113J. Dvorak2.631011671WSep 6 · 16:55J. Dvorak1.918870R. Jamrich1.801111113WSep 6 · 16:25Z. Zahradka1.67119881R. Jamrich2.1091111113LSep 6 · 15:25R. Jamrich3.00118751J. Melichar1.3691111113WSep 4 · 18:00Z. Zahradka1.6111911592R. Jamrich2.20711811113LSep 4 · 16:55R. Jamrich2.0031080M. Dvorak1.731112113LSep 4 · 15:55R. Jamrich2.1054111172Z. Zahradka1.67111196113LSep 4 · 14:55R. Jamrich2.75128751J. Melichar1.40101111113LSep 1 · 17:25F. Balcar1.571111113R. Jamrich2.258770LSep 1 · 16:50R. Jamrich2.63461191L. Moravec1.4411116113
J. Hendrych10
LAug 31 · 18:00M. Dvorak2.101011911113J. Hendrych1.6712811752LAug 31 · 16:55M. Dvorak2.0011115113J. Hendrych1.73681151LAug 31 · 16:25J. Melichar1.83111110113J. Hendrych1.83571251LAug 31 · 15:25J. Hendrych1.679790J. Dvorak2.101111113LAug 28 · 18:47J. Hendrych1.806111091A. Langer1.9011912113WAug 28 · 16:20J. Hendrych1.9110111614113M. Sochor1.80126141692WAug 28 · 15:20J. Hendrych2.75614711113M. Sulc1.40111211692WAug 28 · 14:20J. Hendrych2.201111113A. Langer1.619830WAug 25 · 18:30L. Moravec1.9097100J. Hendrych1.801111123LAug 25 · 16:25L. Moravec2.25117711113J. Hendrych1.5731111882
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.