Form at publish
0 – 3
Set by set
Form at publish
Karel Schopf to win
54.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
RightSent to Pro: Jakub Hradecky @ 2.25 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Set 1 · 4-11
Set 2 · 9-11
Set 3 · 10-12
Point 57 set 3, 10-12 · our read held Karel Schopf at 54.5%
57 points played in total.
H2H Jakub Hradecky 0–4 Karel Schopf Jakub Hradecky has won 0 of their 4 meetings.
Sent to Pro: Jakub Hradecky @ 2.25 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Sent to Pro: Jakub Hradecky @ 2.25 · Lost
54.5%Our read63.7%to break even at 1.571
short by 9.2pp63.7% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.571 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 0 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 16:11 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded