TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13143762
Played Sep 17Finished
Pawel Adamus
Home
1.38
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
1161171210––––
Oskar Sokolowski
Away
2.65
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
2–8Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 24:44 and never touched — 65.3% is still 65.3%
Graded at full timePawel Adamus to win
65.3%
65.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
57 points played in total.
Set by set
1161171210––––
H2H Pawel Adamus 9–1 Oskar Sokolowski Oskar Sokolowski has won 1 of their 10 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 24:44What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.38 (66%)
Adamus
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
9-1 in 10
Adamus
Correct
gap of 8 in 10, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Adamus 1424 vs Sokolowski 1288
Adamus
Correct
both rated, 137 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Adamus 60% vs Sokolowski 20%
Adamus
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Adamus 60% vs Sokolowski 20%
Adamus
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Adamus -1 · Sokolowski +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 72% — Strong (leans Adamus) · live re-read · sealed at 65% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Sokolowski form (20%) is below what odds imply (38%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsAdamus 1.38 / Sokolowski 2.65
Signal prob.72% / 28%
Edge (Adamus)+6.3pp
TT Elite Series · #13143762
Adamus1.38
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite64% won 200 of 314
Up 2–0, closes it99% 98 of 99
Up 1–0, closes it79% 151 of 192
Sokolowski2.65
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog31% won 73 of 238
Down 0–1, comes back17% 26 of 151
Down 0–2, comes back5% 4 of 87
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeAdamus9wins
AwaySokolowski1wins
5 of 10 to a deciderAdamus leads 9–1, and 5 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeAdamus100%8 of 8
AwaySokolowskin = 2, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Adamus8Sokolowski2n = 10Adamus took 8 of 10
S2Adamus7Sokolowski3n = 10Adamus took 7 of 10
S3Adamus4Sokolowski6n = 10Sokolowski took 6 of 10
S4Adamus6Sokolowski3n = 9Adamus took 6 of 9
S5Adamus4Sokolowski1n = 5Adamus took 4 of 5
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home110%
3–1Four sets, home440%
3–2Decider, home440%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricAdamusSokolowskiA − SBasisWins91+8in 10 meetingsFirst set82+6of 10Avg pointsper match45.239.3+5.9per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricAdamusSokolowskiBasisWin rate · lifetime367 / 663 vs 125 / 37155.4%33.7%367 / 663 vs 125 / 371Avg sets wonper match2.21.7per matchAvg pointsper match40.337.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
AdamusAdamus 1.38/Sokolowski 2.65
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
72.1%
Adamus · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Adamus won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 17 · 24:25P. Adamus4211119113O. Sokolowski31851171
WAug 27 · 02:45P. Adamus52111198133O. Sokolowski44651111112
WAug 2 · 15:30P. Adamus4112711113O. Sokolowski351011591
WAug 2 · 09:30P. Adamus50811911113O. Sokolowski3911611832
LJul 10 · 21:45P. Adamus47711811102O. Sokolowski50119117123
WJul 10 · 17:45P. Adamus4611914123O. Sokolowski3851112101
WJun 30 · 12:15P. Adamus51131169123O. Sokolowski501171111102
WJun 30 · 08:35P. Adamus341112113O. Sokolowski2351080
WJun 25 · 09:00P. Adamus46118115113O. Sokolowski4451191182
WJun 25 · 04:30P. Adamus4311138113O. Sokolowski399111181
P. Adamus10
LSep 17 · 07:10P. Adamus2.3614780O. Jadach1.481611113WSep 17 · 06:00P. Adamus2.2011119113J. Pruszkowski1.60761181LSep 17 · 04:25P. Adamus1.70118119102O. Vincenec1.95711511123WSep 17 · 03:10P. Adamus1.80111278113M. Lebek1.90810111172WSep 17 · 02:00O. Vincenec2.006690P. Adamus1.671111113WSep 17 · 01:10O. Jadach1.60491171P. Adamus2.1011111113WSep 17 · 24:25P. Adamus1.3911119113O. Sokolowski2.65851171LSep 16 · 22:50P. Adamus2.0013840M. Lebek1.701511113LSep 16 · 22:00J. Pruszkowski1.6211811113P. Adamus2.15711991WSep 16 · 02:35P. Adamus1.6711511133J. Pruszkowski2.109118111
O. Sokolowski10
WSep 17 · 07:35O. Sokolowski3.15711129113M. Lebek1.28116101132LSep 17 · 06:25O. Jadach1.2811611113O. Sokolowski3.40711681LSep 17 · 05:10J. Pruszkowski1.22111111113O. Sokolowski3.60137971LSep 17 · 03:35O. Vincenec1.551211811113O. Sokolowski2.3014511982LSep 17 · 02:45O. Jadach1.231111123O. Sokolowski3.5086100LSep 17 · 01:35O. Sokolowski2.955121161M. Lebek1.3511148113LSep 17 · 24:25P. Adamus1.3911119113O. Sokolowski2.65851171LSep 16 · 23:10J. Pruszkowski1.221111113O. Sokolowski3.606660WSep 16 · 21:35O. Vincenec1.586111441O. Sokolowski2.25111312113LSep 13 · 17:05F. Witczak1.371211115113O. Sokolowski2.7514751182
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.