TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13115032
Played Sep 12Finished
Ladislav Havel 1956
Home
3.00
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 2
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
811116112811103
Martin Tacinec
Away
1.36
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:55 and never touched — 70.2% is still 70.2%
Graded at full timeMartin Tacinec to win
70.2%
70.2%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingLadislav Havel 1956 above · Martin Tacinec below
Set 1 · 8-11
Set 2 · 11-6
Set 3 · 11-2
Set 4 · 8-11
Set 5 · 10-3
Point 81 set 5, 10-3 — our read held Martin Tacinec at 70.2%
81 points played in total.
H2H Ladislav Havel 1956 4–13 Martin Tacinec Ladislav Havel 1956 has won 4 of their 17 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 12:55What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.36 (69%)
Tacinec
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
4-13 in 17
Tacinec
Wrong
gap of 9 in 17, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Havel 1369 vs Tacinec 1440
Tacinec
Wrong
both rated, 71 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Havel 60% vs Tacinec 80%
Tacinec
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Havel 50% vs Tacinec 70%
Tacinec
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Havel -2 · Tacinec +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 70% — Strong (leans Tacinec)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Havel form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (33%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsHavel 3.00 / Tacinec 1.36
Signal prob.30% / 70%
Edge (Tacinec)+1.6pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13115032
Havel3.00
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog39% won 48 of 123
Down 0–1, comes back15% 10 of 65
Down 0–2, comes back2% 1 of 46
Tacinec1.36
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite67% won 52 of 78
Up 2–0, closes it92% 23 of 25
Up 1–0, closes it91% 38 of 42
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeHavel4wins
AwayTacinec6wins
5 of 10 to a deciderTacinec leads 6–4, and 5 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeHavel60%3 of 5
AwayTacinec80%4 of 5
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Havel5Tacinec5n = 10split evenly
S2Havel3Tacinec7n = 10Tacinec took 7 of 10
S3Havel4Tacinec6n = 10Tacinec took 6 of 10
S4Havel5Tacinec2n = 7Havel took 5 of 7
S5Havel2Tacinec3n = 5Tacinec took 3 of 5
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home110%
3–1Four sets, home110%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away330%
1–3Four sets, away110%
0–3Straight, away220%
These 10 meetings
MetricHavelTacinecH − TBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set550of 10Avg pointsper match36.940.8−3.9per matchSweeps12−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricHavelTacinecBasisWin rate · lifetime263 / 556 vs 157 / 28947.3%54.3%263 / 556 vs 157 / 289Avg sets wonper match1.92.1per matchAvg pointsper match35.937.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
TacinecHavel 3.00/Tacinec 1.36
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
70.4%
Tacinec · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Havel won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WAug 22 · 15:30L. Havel—11511113M. Tacinec—911741
LJun 14 · 07:00L. Havel—91111192M. Tacinec—111158113
LApr 11 · 16:58L. Havel—7690M. Tacinec—1111113
LApr 11 · 15:00L. Havel—12481272M. Tacinec—10111110113
WMar 29 · 06:30L. Havel—1111113M. Tacinec—7860
LNov 23 · 07:00L. Havel—113991M. Tacinec—91111113
LNov 13 · 17:56L. Havel—54111262M. Tacinec—1111610113
WNov 13 · 16:00L. Havel—1115115113M. Tacinec—913131162
LNov 8 · 14:06L. Havel—6760M. Tacinec—1111113
WNov 8 · 11:30L. Havel—1011414113M. Tacinec—127111262
L. Havel10
LSep 12 · 10:30J. Kucharcik1.22811518113L. Havel4.00119111662LAug 31 · 09:28L. Havel1.679121071A. Svoboda2.10111012113WAug 31 · 08:30L. Havel2.10111211113Z. Zikmunda1.67714841WAug 31 · 07:00L. Havel1.801111113M. Ulrych1.918980WAug 31 · 06:00A. Svoboda1.737990L. Havel2.001111113WAug 30 · 13:00L. Havel1.801111123D. Priesol1.9169100LAug 30 · 12:30L. Havel2.757131161M. Tacinec1.4011159113WAug 30 · 11:00L. Havel1.9111117113D. Priesol1.80591171LAug 30 · 10:00J. Briska1.831111133L. Havel1.8395110LAug 29 · 13:30L. Sulava1.2211117133L. Havel4.007511111
M. Tacinec10
WSep 12 · 10:00M. Tacinec1.441111113M. Barta2.631540LAug 30 · 13:29M. Tacinec1.806111310102J. Briska1.911161112123WAug 30 · 12:30L. Havel2.757131161M. Tacinec1.4011159113WAug 30 · 11:30M. Tacinec1.731181015113J. Briska2.00811121362WAug 30 · 10:30D. Priesol1.5361020M. Tacinec2.381112113WAug 22 · 17:30L. Sulava2.10111191192M. Tacinec1.67913113113WAug 22 · 16:00M. Tacinec1.6711911113L. Sulava2.10511571LAug 22 · 15:30L. Havel3.0011511113M. Tacinec1.36911741WAug 22 · 14:00M. Tacinec1.50111297123M. Barta2.508101111102LAug 16 · 08:59M. Tacinec2.0010970D. Barton1.731211113
Upcoming Matches
L. Havel2 of 4 neutral
M. Tacinec
Nothing scheduled
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.