TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13084517
Played Sep 5Finished
Roman Wiza
Home
2.70
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
811611811––––
Lukasz Bernacki
Away
1.39
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:53 and never touched — 67.6% is still 67.6%
Graded at full timeLukasz Bernacki to win
67.6%
67.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
55 points played in total.
Set by set
811611811––––
H2H Roman Wiza 2–13 Lukasz Bernacki Roman Wiza has won 2 of their 15 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 20:53What took a side3 for · 1 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.39 (66%)
Bernacki
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
2-13 in 15
Bernacki
Correct
gap of 11 in 15, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Wiza 1309 vs Bernacki 1401
Bernacki
Correct
both rated, 92 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Wiza 60% vs Bernacki 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Wiza 70% vs Bernacki 50%
Wiza
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Wiza +1 · Bernacki +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 68% — Clear lean (leans Bernacki)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Bernacki form (60%) is below what odds imply (72%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsWiza 2.70 / Bernacki 1.39
Signal prob.32% / 68%
Edge (Bernacki)+1.6pp
TT Elite Series · #13084517
Wiza2.70
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As underdog39% won 88 of 224
Down 0–1, comes back20% 24 of 121
Down 0–2, comes back7% 5 of 72
Bernacki1.39
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As favourite63% won 65 of 104
Up 2–0, closes it95% 41 of 43
Up 1–0, closes it81% 51 of 63
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeWiza0wins
AwayBernacki10wins
3 of 10 to a deciderBernacki leads 10–0, and 3 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeWizan = 2, below the 3 needed
AwayBernacki100%8 of 8
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Wiza2Bernacki8n = 10Bernacki took 8 of 10
S2Wiza3Bernacki7n = 10Bernacki took 7 of 10
S3Wiza3Bernacki7n = 10Bernacki took 7 of 10
S4Wiza1Bernacki5n = 6Bernacki took 5 of 6
S5Wiza0Bernacki3n = 3Bernacki took 3 of 3
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away330%
1–3Four sets, away330%
0–3Straight, away440%
These 10 meetings
MetricWizaBernackiW − BBasisWins010−10in 10 meetingsFirst set28−6of 10Avg pointsper match33.842.3−8.5per matchSweeps04−43–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricWizaBernackiBasisWin rate · lifetime398 / 944 vs 271 / 52242.2%51.9%398 / 944 vs 271 / 522Avg sets wonper match1.82.0per matchAvg pointsper match36.337.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
BernackiWiza 2.70/Bernacki 1.39
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
67.6%
Bernacki · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Bernacki won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 4 · 20:20R. Wiza—8111111122L. Bernacki—119913143
LNov 23 · 02:30R. Wiza—7940L. Bernacki—1111113
LNov 22 · 20:30R. Wiza—108100L. Bernacki—1211123
LNov 8 · 05:20R. Wiza—11940L. Bernacki—1311113
LNov 7 · 19:45R. Wiza—11971182L. Bernacki—811118113
LJul 26 · 21:30R. Wiza—1261171L. Bernacki—14117113
LJul 26 · 03:05R. Wiza—121111962L. Bernacki—1081311113
LApr 5 · 17:55R. Wiza—1261171L. Bernacki—14119113
LApr 4 · 23:55R. Wiza—711651L. Bernacki—11811113
LApr 4 · 17:55R. Wiza—3680L. Bernacki—1111113
R. Wiza10
LSep 6 · 04:20R. Szymik1.191111113R. Wiza4.058880WSep 6 · 03:30L. Bernacki1.704111061R. Wiza2.0011912113LSep 6 · 02:45R. Wiza1.858119101R. Adach1.8511811123LSep 6 · 01:10R. Wiza3.6610760P. Polok1.241211113LSep 6 · 24:20A. Szurgot2.61911811113R. Wiza1.4411711782LSep 5 · 23:05R. Wiza2.101111861R. Adach1.6613811113WSep 5 · 20:20R. Wiza1.591111113A. Szurgot2.186680LSep 5 · 18:45R. Wiza3.752470R. Szymik1.211111113LSep 5 · 17:30R. Wiza3.251011641P. Polok1.2812911113WSep 5 · 04:20R. Szymik1.28611101152R. Wiza3.25118126113
L. Bernacki10
LSep 6 · 05:05L. Bernacki1.8571270R. Adach1.801114113LSep 6 · 03:30L. Bernacki1.704111061R. Wiza2.0011912113WSep 6 · 02:20L. Bernacki1.62911815113A. Szurgot2.17118111372LSep 6 · 24:45L. Bernacki2.059640R. Szymik1.701111113WSep 5 · 23:30L. Bernacki2.40111011173P. Polok1.503124151LSep 5 · 22:20R. Szymik1.805151014113L. Bernacki1.851113121292WSep 5 · 20:45L. Bernacki1.5181112113R. Adach2.331191081LSep 5 · 19:10L. Bernacki2.196860P. Polok1.581111113WSep 5 · 18:20A. Szurgot3.05313471L. Bernacki1.31111111113WSep 5 · 05:05L. Bernacki1.5381111113J. Michalski2.38119631
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.