TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13079708
Played Sep 4Finished
Robert Szymik
Home
1.13
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
8–2Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
1131151210––––
Jakub Michalski
Away
4.95
At publish
Lost last 7Form at publish
1–9Last 10Lost last 7
The read, and what happenedsealed at 22:29 and never touched — 81.7% is still 81.7%
Graded at full timeRobert Szymik to win
81.7%
81.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
52 points played in total.
Set by set
1131151210––––
H2H Robert Szymik 118–16 Jakub Michalski Jakub Michalski has won 16 of their 134 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 22:29What took a side5 for · 1 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.13 (81%)
Szymik
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
118-16 in 134
Szymik
Correct
gap of 102 in 134, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Szymik 1387 vs Michalski 1137
Szymik
Correct
both rated, 250 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Szymik 60% vs Michalski 0%
Szymik
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Szymik 80% vs Michalski 10%
Szymik
Correct
70pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Szymik -1 · Michalski -5
Michalski
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 87% — Strong (leans Szymik) · live re-read · sealed at 82% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Michalski form (0%) is below what odds imply (20%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsSzymik 1.13 / Michalski 4.95
Signal prob.87% / 13%
Edge (Szymik)+5.4pp
TT Elite Series · #13079708
Szymik1.13
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite70% won 272 of 391
Up 2–0, closes it95% 159 of 167
Up 1–0, closes it84% 209 of 250
Michalski4.95
10%won 1 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 7
oldest → newest10%takes the first set · 1 of 10
As underdog31% won 92 of 301
Down 0–1, comes back13% 25 of 195
Down 0–2, comes back2% 2 of 130
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeSzymik8wins
AwayMichalski2wins
Szymik leads 8–2.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeSzymik100%8 of 8
AwayMichalskin = 2, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Szymik8Michalski2n = 10Szymik took 8 of 10
S2Szymik8Michalski2n = 10Szymik took 8 of 10
S3Szymik9Michalski1n = 10Szymik took 9 of 10
S4Szymik1Michalski2n = 3Michalski took 2 of 3
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home770%
3–1Four sets, home110%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricSzymikMichalskiS − MBasisWins82+6in 10 meetingsFirst set82+6of 10Avg pointsper match34.725.5+9.2per matchSweeps70+73–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricSzymikMichalskiBasisWin rate · lifetime620 / 946 vs 412 / 106965.5%38.5%620 / 946 vs 412 / 1069Avg sets wonper match2.31.6per matchAvg pointsper match38.033.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
SzymikSzymik 1.13/Michalski 4.95
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
86.8%
Szymik · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Szymik won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 4 · 17:55R. Szymik—1111113J. Michalski—8570
WAug 29 · 01:55R. Szymik—1111113J. Michalski—6970
LAug 28 · 19:55R. Szymik—10111051J. Michalski—12912113
WAug 15 · 01:55R. Szymik—1111113J. Michalski—8980
WAug 14 · 19:55R. Szymik—1111113J. Michalski—7770
WAug 9 · 01:55R. Szymik—1111113J. Michalski—6760
WAug 8 · 19:55R. Szymik—1111113J. Michalski—6270
WAug 8 · 01:55R. Szymik—1111133J. Michalski—33110
LAug 7 · 19:55R. Szymik—7101191J. Michalski—11128113
WJul 18 · 24:45R. Szymik—11711123J. Michalski—6113101
R. Szymik10
WSep 6 · 04:20R. Szymik1.191111113R. Wiza4.058880WSep 6 · 03:05R. Szymik1.241111113A. Szurgot3.558580LSep 6 · 01:55R. Szymik1.689111381P. Polok2.0711615113WSep 6 · 24:45L. Bernacki2.059640R. Szymik1.701111113WSep 5 · 23:55R. Szymik1.231110118113R. Adach3.6581271162WSep 5 · 22:20R. Szymik1.805151014113L. Bernacki1.851113121292WSep 5 · 21:05R. Szymik1.521111113A. Szurgot2.307460LSep 5 · 19:55R. Szymik1.9512970P. Polok1.751411113WSep 5 · 18:45R. Wiza3.752470R. Szymik1.211111113LSep 5 · 17:55R. Szymik1.26811681R. Adach3.3511611113
J. Michalski10
LSep 5 · 05:05L. Bernacki1.5381111113J. Michalski2.38119631LSep 5 · 03:55J. Michalski2.2011960D. Fira1.571311113LSep 5 · 02:45R. Wiza1.50111310113J. Michalski2.408111281LSep 5 · 01:30K. Juszczyk1.251111113J. Michalski3.708970LSep 4 · 23:05R. Wiza1.601511113J. Michalski2.1013770LSep 4 · 21:55J. Michalski2.0011890D. Fira1.711311113LSep 4 · 20:45P. Gasiorski1.031412123J. Michalski8.701210100LSep 4 · 19:30L. Bernacki1.28111011113J. Michalski3.25412181LSep 4 · 17:55R. Szymik1.121111113J. Michalski5.208570LAug 30 · 04:40K. Juszczyk1.2311117113J. Michalski3.60871151
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.