TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
Jakub Chmielowski vs Przemyslaw Blocho 2-3 · TT Elite Series
TT Elite Series
Played Sep 22Finished
Jakub Chmielowski
Home
1.83
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
1113117211114711
Przemyslaw Blocho
Away
1.83
At publish
Lost last 8Form at publish
2–8Last 10Lost last 8
The read, and what happenedsealed at 15:49 and never touched — 59.1% is still 59.1%
Graded at full timeJakub Chmielowski to win
59.1%
59.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingJakub Chmielowski above · Przemyslaw Blocho below
Set 1 · 11-13
Set 2 · 11-7
Set 3 · 2-11
Set 4 · 11-4
Set 5 · 7-11
Point 88 set 5, 7-11 — our read held Jakub Chmielowski at 59.1%
88 points played in total.
H2H Jakub Chmielowski 0–1 Przemyslaw Blocho Jakub Chmielowski has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 15:49What took a side3 for · 2 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.83 (50%)
Blocho
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-1 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Chmielowski 1622 vs Blocho 1425
Chmielowski
Wrong
both rated, 198 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Chmielowski 60% vs Blocho 0%
Chmielowski
Wrong
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Chmielowski 60% vs Blocho 20%
Chmielowski
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Chmielowski +1 · Blocho -8
Blocho
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Chmielowski) · live re-read · sealed at 59% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Blocho form (0%) is below what odds imply (55%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsChmielowski 1.83 / Blocho 1.83
Signal prob.54% / 46%
Edge (Chmielowski)+4.0pp
TT Elite Series · #13171480
Chmielowski1.83
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Blocho1.83
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
Lost last 8
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomeChmielowski0wins
AwayBlocho1wins
Blocho leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away0
This 1 meeting
MetricChmielowskiBlochoC − BBasisWins01−1in 1 meetingFirst set01−1of 1Avg pointsper match37.038.0−1.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricChmielowskiBlochoBasisWin rate · lifetime349 / 720 vs 585 / 106548.5%54.9%349 / 720 vs 585 / 1065Avg sets wonper match2.02.1per matchAvg pointsper match39.537.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ChmielowskiChmielowski 1.83/Blocho 1.83
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
54%
Chmielowski · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Blocho won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
LSep 21 · 15:45J. Chmielowski37991181P. Blocho3811115113
J. Chmielowski10
WSep 22 · 24:35K. Staszczyk2.00111181172J. Chmielowski1.73781113113LSep 21 · 22:55M. Kolek1.8311116113J. Chmielowski1.83991181WSep 21 · 22:10K. Kostyk2.856880J. Chmielowski1.361111113LSep 21 · 21:25J. Mitas2.0011113113J. Chmielowski1.73861191WSep 21 · 20:05J. Chmielowski1.4411117123M. Minda2.635811101WSep 21 · 18:30M. Kolek2.00812791J. Chmielowski1.73111011113WSep 21 · 17:40K. Kostyk2.63114591J. Chmielowski1.4451111113WSep 21 · 16:55J. Chmielowski1.80411116113J. Mitas1.9111541162LSep 21 · 15:45J. Chmielowski1.44991181P. Blocho2.6311115113LSep 11 · 24:10J. Chmielowski1.831168121M. Kolek1.8381111143
P. Blocho10
LSep 22 · 14:40P. Blocho1.956970B. Czerwinski1.751111113LSep 22 · 13:05P. Blocho2.0551050A. Sobel1.661112113LSep 22 · 11:50P. Blocho2.001510101182J. Zochniak1.711312129113LSep 22 · 10:10P. Blocho1.758760B. Sulkowski1.901111113LSep 22 · 09:00P. Blocho2.159970D. Solilo1.611111113LSep 21 · 19:40M. Kolek1.5391211113P. Blocho2.381110441LSep 21 · 18:50K. Kostyk1.91461111143P. Blocho1.80111165122LSep 21 · 18:05P. Blocho2.2539100J. Mitas1.571111123WSep 21 · 16:30P. Blocho1.6712116113M. Minda2.101041171WSep 21 · 15:45J. Chmielowski1.44991181P. Blocho2.6311115113
Upcoming Matches
J. Chmielowski
Sep 22 · 16:55J. Chmielowski1.83J. Mitas1.83—Sep 22 · 17:40J. Chmielowski1.73L. Pietraszko2.00—Sep 22 · 18:30J. Chmielowski1.57M. Minda2.25—Sep 22 · 20:05J. Chmielowski1.44K. Rudomina2.63—Sep 22 · 21:25J. Chmielowski1.83J. Mitas1.83—Sep 22 · 22:10J. Chmielowski1.73L. Pietraszko2.00—Sep 22 · 22:55J. Chmielowski1.44K. Rudomina2.63—Sep 23 · 24:35J. Chmielowski1.91K. Staszczyk1.80—
P. Blocho
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.