Jakub Chmielowski vs Przemyslaw Blocho 1-3

TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series

TT Elite Series

Played Sep 21Finished

Jakub Chmielowski

Home

1.44

At publish

Lost last 1

Form at publish

4–6Last 10Lost last 1

Final

1 – 3

Set by set

911911115811––

Przemyslaw Blocho

Away

2.63

At publish

Lost last 4

Form at publish

2–8Last 10Lost last 4

The read, and what happenedsealed at 15:56 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%

Graded at full time

Jakub Chmielowski to win

54.0%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Wrong

not sent

How it is goingJakub Chmielowski above · Przemyslaw Blocho below

Set 1 · 9-11

Set 2 · 9-11

Set 3 · 11-5

Set 4 · 8-11

Point 75 set 4, 8-11 — our read held Jakub Chmielowski at 54.0%

75 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 15:56

What took a side4 for · 1 against · 1 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.44 (65%)

Chmielowski

Wrong

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Chmielowski 1609 vs Blocho 1479

Chmielowski

Wrong

both rated, 130 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Chmielowski 40% vs Blocho 20%

Chmielowski

Wrong

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Chmielowski 40% vs Blocho 20%

Chmielowski

Wrong

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Chmielowski -1 · Blocho -4

Blocho

Correct

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

4 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 67% — Clear lean (leans Chmielowski) · live re-read · sealed at 54% before the first serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Blocho form (20%) is below what odds imply (38%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsChmielowski 1.44 / Blocho 2.63

Signal prob.67% / 33%

Edge (Chmielowski)+2.8pp

TT Elite Series · #13165457

Chmielowski1.44

40%won 4 of 10 · last 10

Last match: 11 days ago (Sep 11) · back after a break

oldest → newest

70%takes the first set · 7 of 10

As favourite59% won 117 of 199

Up 2–0, closes it92% 54 of 59

Up 1–0, closes it72% 94 of 130

Blocho2.63

20%won 2 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

Lost last 4

oldest → newest

30%takes the first set · 3 of 10

As underdog41% won 52 of 126

Down 0–1, comes back22% 16 of 73

Down 0–2, comes back6% 2 of 34

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricChmielowskiBlochoBasisWin rate · lifetime360 / 740 vs 583 / 105548.7%55.3%360 / 740 vs 583 / 1055Avg sets wonper match2.02.1per matchAvg pointsper match39.437.7per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Chmielowski

Chmielowski 1.44/Blocho 2.63

Read onlywould have missed

What we said

67.3%

Chmielowski · sealed before the serve

What happened

1–3

Blocho won

Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

J. Chmielowski10