TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13099964
Played Sep 9Finished
Kamil Delikatny
Home
2.63
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 2
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
118116911611511
Andriej Fomin
Away
1.44
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 17:58 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeKamil Delikatny to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingKamil Delikatny above · Andriej Fomin below
Set 1 · 11-8
Set 2 · 11-6
Set 3 · 9-11
Set 4 · 6-11
Set 5 · 5-11
Point 89 set 5, 5-11 — our read held Kamil Delikatny at 54.0%
89 points played in total.
H2H Kamil Delikatny 1–1 Andriej Fomin Dead even across their 2 meetings.
Last 2 · 1–1Head to head
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 17:58What took a side0 for · 2 against · 4 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.44 (65%)
Fomin
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-1 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Delikatny 1324 vs Fomin 1441
Fomin
Correct
both rated, 117 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Delikatny 40% vs Fomin 40%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Delikatny 30% vs Fomin 40%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Delikatny -2 · Fomin -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
0 for, 4 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 67% — Clear lean (leans Fomin) · live re-read · sealed at 46% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Fomin form (40%) is below what odds imply (69%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsDelikatny 2.63 / Fomin 1.44
Signal prob.33% / 67%
Edge (Fomin)+2.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13099964
Delikatny2.63
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog42% won 49 of 118
Down 0–1, comes back17% 9 of 54
Down 0–2, comes back3% 1 of 36
Fomin1.44
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As favourite71% won 280 of 392
Up 2–0, closes it98% 157 of 160
Up 1–0, closes it89% 220 of 248
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeDelikatny1wins
AwayFomin1wins
Level at 1–1.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home1
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away0
These 2 meetings
MetricDelikatnyFominD − FBasisWins110in 2 meetingsFirst set02−2of 2Avg pointsper match35.538.0−2.5per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricDelikatnyFominBasisWin rate · lifetime227 / 474 vs 513 / 88247.9%58.2%227 / 474 vs 513 / 882Avg sets wonper match1.92.1per matchAvg pointsper match34.538.0per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
FominDelikatny 2.63/Fomin 1.44
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
67.3%
Fomin · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Fomin won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LJul 30 · 24:10K. Delikatny—841181A. Fomin—11116113
WJul 29 · 20:30K. Delikatny—71111113A. Fomin—119891
K. Delikatny10
LSep 9 · 04:40K. Delikatny1.584101191A. Barton2.2511129113LSep 9 · 03:05M. Machelski2.11117127113K. Delikatny1.66911101152WSep 9 · 02:20H. Tkaczyk1.328670K. Delikatny2.901111113LSep 9 · 01:30K. Delikatny1.698570A. Krezel1.961111113WSep 9 · 24:20K. Delikatny1.7751111113M. Brunner1.87116391LSep 8 · 22:40K. Delikatny1.326720A. Barton3.051111113WSep 8 · 21:05J. Michalik1.851012731K. Delikatny1.85121011113LSep 8 · 20:20M. Brunner1.901211113K. Delikatny1.8010460LSep 8 · 19:30K. Delikatny1.80133381A. Krezel1.85111111113LSep 8 · 18:20K. Delikatny3.0010650H. Tkaczyk1.331211113
A. Fomin10
LSep 6 · 02:45A. Fomin3.3081180H. Tkaczyk1.271113113WSep 6 · 01:10A. Fomin1.70111188113C. Pawlik1.9558111182WSep 6 · 24:00A. Fomin1.5491311113K. Gudzik2.251111891LSep 5 · 22:25A. Fomin1.8711621192A. Krezel1.80511117113LSep 5 · 21:10A. Fomin2.7561090J. Oracz1.401112113WSep 5 · 20:00A. Krezel1.907830A. Fomin1.801111113LSep 5 · 19:10C. Pawlik1.761511113A. Fomin1.9513690LSep 5 · 18:25A. Fomin3.40611961H. Tkaczyk1.2611711113LSep 5 · 16:50A. Fomin2.706570J. Oracz1.391111113WSep 5 · 16:00K. Gudzik2.25117871A. Fomin1.5491111113
Upcoming Matches
K. Delikatny
Sep 9 · 17:20K. Delikatny2.38A. Zmijewski1.53—Sep 9 · 18:30K. Delikatny2.12M. Baran1.59—Sep 9 · 19:40K. Delikatny1.50A. Skupinski2.30—Sep 9 · 21:20K. Delikatny2.60A. Fomin1.40—Sep 9 · 22:10K. Delikatny1.37A. Barton2.70—Sep 9 · 23:20K. Delikatny2.65A. Zmijewski1.38—Sep 10 · 24:35K. Delikatny2.00M. Baran1.73—Sep 10 · 01:45K. Delikatny1.80M. Lewczuk1.91—
A. Fomin
Sep 9 · 16:55A. Fomin1.73M. Baran2.00—Sep 9 · 18:10A. Fomin1.23A. Skupinski3.45—Sep 9 · 19:20A. Fomin2.00A. Zmijewski1.73—Sep 9 · 20:30A. Fomin1.80M. Lewczuk1.91—Sep 9 · 21:20A. Fomin1.40K. Delikatny2.60—Sep 9 · 22:55A. Fomin1.73M. Baran2.00—Sep 10 · 24:10A. Fomin1.80M. Lewczuk1.91—Sep 10 · 01:25A. Fomin2.00A. Zmijewski1.73—Sep 10 · 02:35A. Fomin1.06A. Barton8.00—
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.