TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13077787
Played Sep 5Finished
Ivo Taichman
Home
1.83
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
1171816119––––
Tomas Kraninger
Away
1.83
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 14:27 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeIvo Taichman to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingIvo Taichman above · Tomas Kraninger below
Set 1 · 11-7
Set 2 · 18-16
Set 3 · 11-9
Point 72 set 3, 11-9 — our read held Ivo Taichman at 54.0%
72 points played in total.
H2H Ivo Taichman 9–7 Tomas Kraninger Tomas Kraninger has won 7 of their 16 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 14:27What took a side2 for · 3 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.83 (50%)
Kraninger
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
9-7 in 16
Taichman
Correct
gap of 2 in 16, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Taichman 1451 vs Kraninger 1428
Taichman
Correct
both rated, 23 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Taichman 60% vs Kraninger 80%
Kraninger
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Taichman 50% vs Kraninger 50%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Taichman +2 · Kraninger +4
Kraninger
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Taichman)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Kraninger form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (55%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsTaichman 1.83 / Kraninger 1.83
Signal prob.54% / 46%
Edge (Taichman)+4.0pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13077787
Taichman1.83
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
Kraninger1.83
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeTaichman4wins
AwayKraninger6wins
3 of 10 to a deciderKraninger leads 6–4, and 3 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeTaichman75%3 of 4
AwayKraninger83.3%5 of 6
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Taichman4Kraninger6n = 10Kraninger took 6 of 10
S2Taichman6Kraninger4n = 10Taichman took 6 of 10
S3Taichman3Kraninger7n = 10Kraninger took 7 of 10
S4Taichman4Kraninger3n = 7Taichman took 4 of 7
S5Taichman1Kraninger2n = 3Kraninger took 2 of 3
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home110%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home110%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away220%
These 10 meetings
MetricTaichmanKraningerT − KBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set46−2of 10Avg pointsper match38.837.7+1.1per matchSweeps12−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricTaichmanKraningerBasisWin rate · lifetime248 / 485 vs 116 / 23151.1%50.2%248 / 485 vs 116 / 231Avg sets wonper match2.02.0per matchAvg pointsper match38.537.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
TaichmanTaichman 1.83/Kraninger 1.83
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
54%
Taichman · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Taichman won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 5 · 20:00I. Taichman—1118113T. Kraninger—71690
WAug 29 · 11:00I. Taichman—11118113T. Kraninger—961191
WAug 6 · 17:03I. Taichman—1051111113T. Kraninger—12112572
LAug 6 · 14:00I. Taichman—811121282T. Kraninger—1161410113
LAug 1 · 19:00I. Taichman—6111181T. Kraninger—11113113
LJul 18 · 06:00I. Taichman—119111392T. Kraninger—611515113
LJun 21 · 06:30I. Taichman—11690T. Kraninger—1311113
LJun 5 · 17:30I. Taichman—9380T. Kraninger—1111113
LJun 5 · 15:00I. Taichman—711581T. Kraninger—11211113
WMar 24 · 17:58I. Taichman—11128113T. Kraninger—5101181
I. Taichman10
WSep 5 · 21:28I. Taichman1.73911119113T. Kraninger2.0011451182WSep 5 · 19:30J. Stach2.5087110I. Taichman1.501111133WSep 5 · 18:00I. Taichman1.611111911113M. Jasek2.2091311882LAug 31 · 13:30V. Bosak1.8019119113I. Taichman1.911791171LAug 31 · 12:30V. Bosak1.80911711113I. Taichman1.9111911492WAug 31 · 11:30I. Taichman2.00111178113M. Koral1.7355111182WAug 31 · 10:30T. Milkov1.83105111192I. Taichman1.83121159113LAug 29 · 20:59I. Taichman1.83814761V. Bosak1.83111211113LAug 29 · 20:00I. Taichman2.101171091R. Adam1.6781112113LAug 29 · 19:30V. Bosak2.101113113I. Taichman1.6771180
T. Kraninger10
LSep 5 · 21:28I. Taichman1.73911119113T. Kraninger2.0011451182WSep 5 · 19:00M. Jasek2.2061141182T. Kraninger1.61117113113WSep 5 · 18:30T. Kraninger1.801011811113J. Stach1.9112711872WAug 29 · 12:59T. Kraninger1.91118611113F. Zurek1.8081111782WAug 29 · 12:30T. Kraninger2.201111710113F. Zurek1.6178111272LAug 29 · 11:00T. Kraninger1.83961191I. Taichman1.8311118113LAug 29 · 10:00M. Blejchar1.501111411133T. Kraninger2.50913117112LAug 28 · 17:11T. Kraninger3.759980F. Zurek1.251111113LAug 28 · 16:30T. Kraninger1.801111111082F. Zurek1.91139812113WAug 28 · 15:00T. Kraninger2.001111143V. Cerny1.7389120
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.