TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13055502
Played Sep 1Finished
Gracjan Kesik
Home
1.83
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
311118511911––
Kamil Rudomina
Away
1.83
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 21:09 and never touched — 57.3% is still 57.3%
Graded at full timeKamil Rudomina to win
57.3%
57.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
69 points played in total.
Set by set
311118511911––
H2H Gracjan Kesik 8–12 Kamil Rudomina Gracjan Kesik has won 8 of their 20 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 21:09What took a side2 for · 2 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.83 (50%)
Rudomina
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
8-12 in 20
Rudomina
Correct
gap of 4 in 20, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Kesik 1509 vs Rudomina 1508
Kesik
Wrong
both rated, 2 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Kesik 40% vs Rudomina 20%
Kesik
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Kesik 40% vs Rudomina 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Kesik -1 · Rudomina -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Kesik) · live re-read · sealed at 43% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Rudomina form (20%) is below what odds imply (55%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsKesik 1.83 / Rudomina 1.83
Signal prob.54% / 46%
Edge (Kesik)+4.0pp
TT Elite Series · #13055502
Kesik1.83
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
Rudomina1.83
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
20%takes the first set · 2 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeKesik4wins
AwayRudomina6wins
2 of 10 to a deciderRudomina leads 6–4, and 2 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeKesik66.7%4 of 6
AwayRudomina100%4 of 4
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Kesik6Rudomina4n = 10Kesik took 6 of 10
S2Kesik3Rudomina7n = 10Rudomina took 7 of 10
S3Kesik5Rudomina5n = 10split evenly
S4Kesik4Rudomina2n = 6Kesik took 4 of 6
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home220%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away220%
These 10 meetings
MetricKesikRudominaK − RBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set64+2of 10Avg pointsper match33.334.8−1.5per matchSweeps2203–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricKesikRudominaBasisWin rate · lifetime311 / 575 vs 1003 / 214954.1%46.7%311 / 575 vs 1003 / 2149Avg sets wonper match2.11.9per matchAvg pointsper match38.537.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
KesikKesik 1.83/Rudomina 1.83
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
54%
Kesik · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Rudomina won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WJul 3 · 11:25G. Kesik—1111113K. Rudomina—9970
LJun 7 · 13:35G. Kesik—441171K. Rudomina—11119113
LMay 31 · 05:00G. Kesik—1011841K. Rudomina—12911113
WApr 19 · 12:10G. Kesik—11911113K. Rudomina—711661
LApr 19 · 06:15G. Kesik—8460K. Rudomina—1111113
WApr 18 · 07:05G. Kesik—1111113K. Rudomina—5730
LApr 18 · 04:35G. Kesik—11681182K. Rudomina—611119113
LApr 11 · 12:10G. Kesik—11961372K. Rudomina—5111111113
WApr 6 · 13:55G. Kesik—11611113K. Rudomina—311971
LFeb 1 · 01:15G. Kesik—7660K. Rudomina—1111113
G. Kesik10
LSep 1 · 14:40G. Kesik1.861590B. Czerwinski1.811111113WSep 1 · 13:05G. Kesik2.2291111113S. Brud1.57118981WSep 1 · 11:50G. Kesik2.10611135113A. Sobel1.65112111162LSep 1 · 10:10G. Kesik1.991011911102P. Blocho1.70129115123LSep 1 · 07:40D. Kosmal1.371111113G. Kesik2.758780WSep 1 · 06:50S. Brud1.608101181G. Kesik2.2011127113LSep 1 · 06:00G. Kesik1.858770A. Sobel1.851111113LSep 1 · 04:25G. Kesik2.4011118832J. Zochniak1.50491111113WSep 1 · 03:40M. Minda1.46127311102G. Kesik2.461011115123WAug 31 · 14:40G. Kesik1.7013511113B. Mleczko1.951111751
K. Rudomina10
LSep 3 · 08:05M. Minda1.8011913163K. Rudomina1.8691111141LSep 3 · 07:15J. Glanowski1.861311114113K. Rudomina1.8015751182LSep 3 · 05:15D. Solilo1.60149136113K. Rudomina2.101211111132LSep 3 · 04:25J. Zochniak1.6551112123K. Rudomina2.0511410101WSep 3 · 03:00G. Poliniewicz1.276850K. Rudomina3.351111113LSep 2 · 14:20K. Rudomina1.411213781R. Stapor2.60141111113LSep 2 · 12:40J. Glanowski1.83116114133K. Rudomina1.87211311112WSep 2 · 11:50B. Kwodawski2.4511127732K. Rudomina1.471101111113LSep 2 · 11:00K. Rudomina1.3251171292M. Zwolinski3.051171110113LSep 2 · 09:50K. Rudomina2.1511119772S. Brud1.61981111113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.