Form at publish
3 – 2
Set by set
Form at publish
Valerii Hel to win
56.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
Set 1 · 11-5
Set 2 · 9-11
Set 3 · 11-9
Set 4 · 8-11
Set 5 · 11-4
Point 90 set 5, 11-4 · our read held Valerii Hel at 56.1%
90 points played in total.
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together: one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
56.1%Our read63.7%to break even at 1.571
short by 7.6pp63.7% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.571 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 1 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands: it is the only comparison available.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 05:51 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded