Form at publish
3 – 1
Set by set
Form at publish
Pawel Polok to win
65.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
WrongSent to Pro: Pawel Polok @ 1.50 · Lost
Set 1 · 11-9
Set 2 · 11-9
Set 3 · 5-11
Set 4 · 11-6
Point 73 set 4, 11-6 · our read held Pawel Polok at 65.3%
73 points played in total.
H2H Zbigniew Sobkow 1–2 Pawel Polok Zbigniew Sobkow has won 1 of their 3 meetings.
Sent to Pro: Pawel Polok @ 1.50 · Lost
65.3%Our read65.2%to break even at 1.533
clears by 0.1pp65.2% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.533 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 1 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Sent to Pro: Pawel Polok @ 1.50 · Lost
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 06:50 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded