Jirasek Martin vs Miroslav Cyrus 3-0

TT Lossbeater/TT Cup

TT Cup

Played Sep 29Finished

Jirasek Martin

Home

1.40

At publish

Lost last 7

Form at publish

3–7Last 10Lost last 7

Final

3 – 0

Set by set

116117119––––

Miroslav Cyrus

Away

2.75

At publish

Lost last 1

Form at publish

4–6Last 10Lost last 1

The read, and what happenedsealed at 18:01 and never touched: 69.1% is still 69.1%

Graded at full time

Jirasek Martin to win

69.1%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct, not a call that won.

How it is goingJirasek Martin above · Miroslav Cyrus below

Set 1 · 11-6

Set 2 · 11-7

Set 3 · 11-9

Point 55 set 3, 11-9 · our read held Jirasek Martin at 69.1%

55 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 18:01

What took a side3 for · 1 against · 2 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.40 (66%)

Martin

Correct

no bar to clear: a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Martin 1476 vs Cyrus 1342

Martin

Correct

both rated, 134 points apart, no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Martin 0% vs Cyrus 40%

Cyrus

Wrong

40pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Martin 30% vs Cyrus 40%

—

Too close

10pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Streak

Martin -7 · Cyrus -1

Martin

Correct

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

3 for, 2 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 69% · Clear lean (leans Martin) · sealed before the serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Martin form (0%) is below what odds imply (71%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsMartin 1.40 / Cyrus 2.75

Signal prob.69% / 31%

Edge (Martin)+2.8pp

TT Cup · #13215796

Martin1.40

30%won 3 of 10 · last 10

Last match: 3 days ago (Sep 26)

Lost last 7

oldest → newest

70%takes the first set · 7 of 10

As favourite60% won 29 of 48

Up 2–0, closes it94% 17 of 18

Up 1–0, closes it79% 22 of 28

Cyrus2.75

40%won 4 of 10 · last 10

Last match: 11 days ago (Sep 18) · back after a break

oldest → newest

40%takes the first set · 4 of 10

As underdog35% won 20 of 57

Down 0–1, comes back18% 6 of 34

Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 19

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands: it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricMartinCyrusBasisWin rate · lifetime61 / 117 vs 89 / 19652.1%45.4%61 / 117 vs 89 / 196Avg sets wonper match2.11.9per matchAvg pointsper match37.037.5per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did: no prediction

Match Winner

Martin

Martin 1.40/Cyrus 2.75

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

69.1%

Martin · sealed before the serve

What happened

3–0

Martin won

Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together: one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

J. Martin10