TT Lossbeater/Challenger Series TT
Challenger Series TTMatch #13127645
Played Sep 14Finished
Jaime Lama
Home
No price at publish
Won last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Won last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
811311711––––
Yu-Lun Su
Away
No price at publish
Lost last 3Form at publish
1–8Last 9Lost last 3
The read, and what happenedsealed at 04:14 and never touched — 63.6% is still 63.6%
Graded at full timeJaime Lama to win
63.6%
63.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
51 points played in total.
Set by set
811311711––––
H2H Jaime Lama 0–1 Yu-Lun Su Jaime Lama has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 04:14What took a side2 for · 1 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
No price
—
No value
no price published for this match
H2H
0-1 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Form (L5)
Lama 60% vs Su 20%
Lama
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Lama 30% vs Su 11%
Lama
Wrong
19pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Lama +1 · Su -3
Su
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 64% — Clear lean (leans Lama)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
No odds data available
Challenger Series TT · #13127645
Lama
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
10%takes the first set · 1 of 10
Su
11%won 1 of 9 · last 10
Lost last 3
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 2 of 4
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomeLama0wins
AwaySu1wins
Su leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away1
This 1 meeting
MetricLamaSuL − SBasisWins01−1in 1 meetingFirst set01−1of 1Avg pointsper match18.033.0−15.0per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricLamaSuBasisWin rate · lifetime75 / 187 vs 0 / 440.1%0%75 / 187 vs 0 / 4Avg sets wonper match1.71.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
LamaRead onlywould have missed
What we said
63.6%
Lama · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Su won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
LSep 14 · 06:30J. Lama188370Y. Su331111113
J. Lama10
WMay 22 · 08:00J. Lama1.53911111113S. Happek2.3811911462LMay 21 · 17:00J. Lama10.008590M. Danzer1.031111113LMay 21 · 15:00J. Lama2.109111712102L. Kraus1.671191514123WMay 21 · 14:00J. Lama1.10119911113A. Moreno6.5081111682WMay 21 · 10:30J. Lama1.3391111113D. Zech3.25114791LMay 21 · 08:30J. Lama10.005131181R. Turrini1.0311156113LMay 21 · 06:30J. Lama6.0068100D. Rinderer1.111111123LMay 19 · 08:30J. Lama7.0010790M. Hollo1.081211113LMay 19 · 06:30J. Lama8.001512681K. Fadeev1.06171011113LMay 18 · 16:00J. Lama2.6391141172J. Loffler1.44116118113
Y. Su4
Upcoming Matches
J. Lama
Y. Su
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.