TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13082629
Played Sep 5Finished
Roman Piechnik
Home
1.75
At publish
Won last 5Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 5
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
711911911––––
Witold Buczynski
Away
1.95
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:50 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeRoman Piechnik to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
58 points played in total.
Set by set
711911911––––
H2H Roman Piechnik 0–1 Witold Buczynski Roman Piechnik has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 12:50What took a side2 for · 1 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.75 (53%)
Piechnik
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-1 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Piechnik 1325 vs Buczynski 1337
Buczynski
Correct
both rated, 12 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Piechnik 100% vs Buczynski 80%
Piechnik
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Piechnik 60% vs Buczynski 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Piechnik +5 · Buczynski +4
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Piechnik)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Buczynski form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (51%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsPiechnik 1.75 / Buczynski 1.95
Signal prob.54% / 46%
Edge (Piechnik)+1.3pp
TT Elite Series · #13082629
Piechnik1.75
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 5
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite
Fewer than 10 matches in this role
Buczynski1.95
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog37% won 185 of 507
Down 0–1, comes back21% 64 of 301
Down 0–2, comes back5% 9 of 173
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomePiechnik0wins
AwayBuczynski1wins
Buczynski leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away1
This 1 meeting
MetricPiechnikBuczynskiP − BBasisWins01−1in 1 meetingFirst set01−1of 1Avg pointsper match24.033.0−9.0per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricPiechnikBuczynskiBasisWin rate · lifetime16 / 36 vs 430 / 111244.4%38.7%16 / 36 vs 430 / 1112Avg sets wonper match1.71.8per matchAvg pointsper match35.836.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
PiechnikPiechnik 1.75/Buczynski 1.95
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
54%
Piechnik · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Buczynski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
LSep 5 · 05:30R. Piechnik—8790W. Buczynski—1111113
R. Piechnik10
WSep 6 · 16:20M. Lach1.6071040R. Piechnik2.151112113LSep 6 · 15:30K. Slawinski1.70911911113R. Piechnik2.0011211392WSep 6 · 14:45R. Piechnik1.501114113M. Oracz2.5091270LSep 6 · 13:10R. Piechnik2.258611101W. Wojtaszczyk1.5711115123WSep 6 · 12:20R. Wojcik1.68121111492R. Piechnik2.02149911113LSep 6 · 11:05R. Piechnik2.507116111M. Oracz1.4511911133LSep 6 · 09:30R. Piechnik2.6011811492K. Slawinski1.41511911113LSep 6 · 08:20R. Piechnik1.95714551R. Wojcik1.75111211113LSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113WSep 6 · 05:30R. Piechnik—1112133W. Wojtaszczyk—410110
W. Buczynski10
WSep 5 · 16:40J. Jesiek1.7611690W. Buczynski1.901311113WSep 5 · 15:55P. Slosarczyk1.95610131192W. Buczynski1.741112117113WSep 5 · 13:55R. Idaczyk1.607114101W. Buczynski2.1011911123WSep 5 · 11:30M. Lach1.24111091182W. Buczynski3.80512118113WSep 5 · 10:40K. Juszczyk1.407750W. Buczynski2.651111113WSep 5 · 09:55P. Slosarczyk1.9512441182W. Buczynski1.751011118113WSep 5 · 07:55R. Idaczyk1.7561181192W. Buczynski1.95116115113LSep 5 · 07:10M. Lach1.47711115143W. Buczynski2.45113511122WSep 5 · 05:30R. Piechnik—8790W. Buczynski—1111113LSep 2 · 17:05M. Rus2.701111113W. Buczynski1.377890
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.