TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13081176
Played Sep 5Finished
Marcin Lach
Home
1.47
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
7111131155111412
Witold Buczynski
Away
2.45
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 05:40 and never touched — 77.9% is still 77.9%
Graded at full timeMarcin Lach to win
77.9%
77.9%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
90 points played in total.
Set by set
7111131155111412
H2H Marcin Lach 9–3 Witold Buczynski Witold Buczynski has won 3 of their 12 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 05:40What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.47 (63%)
Lach
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
9-3 in 12
Lach
Correct
gap of 6 in 12, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Lach 1430 vs Buczynski 1381
Lach
Correct
both rated, 49 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Lach 60% vs Buczynski 40%
Lach
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Lach 60% vs Buczynski 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Lach -1 · Buczynski +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 65% — Clear lean (leans Lach) · live re-read · sealed at 78% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsLach 1.47 / Buczynski 2.45
Signal prob.65% / 35%
Edge (Lach)+2.4pp
TT Elite Series · #13081176
Lach1.47
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite66% won 114 of 174
Up 2–0, closes it99% 66 of 67
Up 1–0, closes it80% 83 of 104
Buczynski2.45
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog37% won 191 of 514
Down 0–1, comes back22% 65 of 302
Down 0–2, comes back5% 9 of 173
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeLach7wins
AwayBuczynski3wins
4 of 10 to a deciderLach leads 7–3, and 4 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeLach85.7%6 of 7
AwayBuczynski66.7%2 of 3
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Lach7Buczynski3n = 10Lach took 7 of 10
S2Lach8Buczynski2n = 10Lach took 8 of 10
S3Lach5Buczynski5n = 10split evenly
S4Lach4Buczynski3n = 7Lach took 4 of 7
S5Lach2Buczynski2n = 4split evenly
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home330%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away110%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricLachBuczynskiL − BBasisWins73+4in 10 meetingsFirst set73+4of 10Avg pointsper match41.834.8+7.0per matchSweeps30+33–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricLachBuczynskiBasisWin rate · lifetime136 / 216 vs 432 / 111363%38.8%136 / 216 vs 432 / 1113Avg sets wonper match2.31.8per matchAvg pointsper match38.736.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
LachLach 1.47/Buczynski 2.45
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
64.9%
Lach · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Lach won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 5 · 11:30M. Lach—111091182W. Buczynski—512118113
WSep 5 · 07:10M. Lach—711115143W. Buczynski—113511122
WAug 22 · 13:55M. Lach—1111113W. Buczynski—4390
LAug 22 · 04:10M. Lach—811151182W. Buczynski—118175113
WAug 10 · 11:00M. Lach—1211123W. Buczynski—106100
WAug 10 · 04:55M. Lach—1111113W. Buczynski—6890
LAug 9 · 11:00M. Lach—111961W. Buczynski—11611113
WAug 9 · 04:55M. Lach—111011113W. Buczynski—212321
WJul 19 · 12:15M. Lach—11111211113W. Buczynski—99141362
WJul 19 · 08:35M. Lach—11118113W. Buczynski—961171
M. Lach10
LSep 6 · 16:20M. Lach1.6071040R. Piechnik2.151112113WSep 6 · 15:05M. Lach1.65131112113R. Wojcik2.101161471WSep 6 · 13:55M. Lach1.6911511113W. Wojtaszczyk2.01411491WSep 6 · 12:45K. Slawinski1.75781181M. Lach1.9511118113LSep 6 · 11:55M. Lach1.86911991M. Oracz1.8011711113LSep 6 · 10:20M. Lach1.95811971K. Slawinski1.7011811113WSep 6 · 09:05M. Lach1.6311139113R. Wojcik2.108111111WSep 6 · 07:55M. Lach1.7111712123W. Wojtaszczyk2.0061110101WSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113LSep 6 · 05:55M. Lach—1012841M. Oracz—121011113
W. Buczynski10
WSep 5 · 16:40J. Jesiek1.7611690W. Buczynski1.901311113WSep 5 · 15:55P. Slosarczyk1.95610131192W. Buczynski1.741112117113WSep 5 · 13:55R. Idaczyk1.607114101W. Buczynski2.1011911123WSep 5 · 13:10R. Piechnik1.757990W. Buczynski1.951111113WSep 5 · 11:30M. Lach1.24111091182W. Buczynski3.80512118113WSep 5 · 10:40K. Juszczyk1.407750W. Buczynski2.651111113WSep 5 · 09:55P. Slosarczyk1.9512441182W. Buczynski1.751011118113WSep 5 · 07:55R. Idaczyk1.7561181192W. Buczynski1.95116115113WSep 5 · 05:30R. Piechnik—8790W. Buczynski—1111113LSep 2 · 17:05M. Rus2.701111113W. Buczynski1.377890
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.