TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13088101
Played Sep 6Finished
Marcin Lach
Home
1.60
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 3
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
7111012411––––
Roman Piechnik
Away
2.15
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 14:43 and never touched — 64.6% is still 64.6%
Graded at full timeMarcin Lach to win
64.6%
64.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
55 points played in total.
Set by set
7111012411––––
H2H Marcin Lach 2–1 Roman Piechnik Roman Piechnik has won 1 of their 3 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 14:43What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.60 (57%)
Lach
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
2-1 in 3
—
Too close
gap of 1, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Lach 1450 vs Piechnik 1280
Lach
Wrong
both rated, 170 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Lach 60% vs Piechnik 40%
Lach
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Lach 60% vs Piechnik 30%
Lach
Wrong
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Lach +3 · Piechnik -1
Lach
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 60% — Slight lean (leans Lach) · live re-read · sealed at 65% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsLach 1.60 / Piechnik 2.15
Signal prob.60% / 40%
Edge (Lach)+2.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13088101
Lach1.60
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite65% won 109 of 168
Up 2–0, closes it99% 64 of 65
Up 1–0, closes it79% 78 of 99
Piechnik2.15
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog35% won 8 of 23
Down 0–1, comes back19% 3 of 16
Down 0–2, comes back15% 2 of 13
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 3 meetings
HomeLach2wins
AwayPiechnik1wins
1 of 3 to a deciderLach leads 2–1, and 1 of those 3 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 3 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Lach2Piechnik1n = 3Lach took 2 of 3
S2Lach2Piechnik1n = 3Lach took 2 of 3
S3Lach2Piechnik1n = 3Lach took 2 of 3
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 3 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 3 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home133%
3–1Four sets, home133%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away133%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 3 meetings
MetricLachPiechnikL − PBasisWins21+1in 3 meetingsFirst set21+1of 3Avg pointsper match43.738.3+5.4per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricLachPiechnikBasisWin rate · lifetime136 / 215 vs 19 / 4963.3%38.8%136 / 215 vs 19 / 49Avg sets wonper match2.31.6per matchAvg pointsper match38.835.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
LachLach 1.60/Piechnik 2.15
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
60.1%
Lach · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Piechnik won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record3
WSep 6 · 06:45M. Lach—12913113R. Piechnik—10111161
WSep 5 · 15:30M. Lach—1111113R. Piechnik—8580
LSep 5 · 09:30M. Lach—8141011102R. Piechnik—1112129123
M. Lach10
WSep 6 · 15:05M. Lach1.65131112113R. Wojcik2.101161471WSep 6 · 13:55M. Lach1.6911511113W. Wojtaszczyk2.01411491WSep 6 · 12:45K. Slawinski1.75781181M. Lach1.9511118113LSep 6 · 11:55M. Lach1.86911991M. Oracz1.8011711113LSep 6 · 10:20M. Lach1.95811971K. Slawinski1.7011811113WSep 6 · 09:05M. Lach1.6311139113R. Wojcik2.108111111WSep 6 · 07:55M. Lach1.7111712123W. Wojtaszczyk2.0061110101WSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113LSep 6 · 05:55M. Lach—1012841M. Oracz—121011113LSep 5 · 17:05M. Lach1.303660P. Slosarczyk3.201111113
R. Piechnik10
LSep 6 · 15:30K. Slawinski1.70911911113R. Piechnik2.0011211392WSep 6 · 14:45R. Piechnik1.501114113M. Oracz2.5091270LSep 6 · 13:10R. Piechnik2.258611101W. Wojtaszczyk1.5711115123WSep 6 · 12:20R. Wojcik1.68121111492R. Piechnik2.02149911113LSep 6 · 11:05R. Piechnik2.507116111M. Oracz1.4511911133LSep 6 · 09:30R. Piechnik2.6011811492K. Slawinski1.41511911113LSep 6 · 08:20R. Piechnik1.95714551R. Wojcik1.75111211113LSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113WSep 6 · 05:30R. Piechnik—1112133W. Wojtaszczyk—410110LSep 5 · 16:20R. Idaczyk2.01121111113R. Piechnik1.69147981
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.