TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13083020
Played Sep 5Finished
Marcin Lach
Home
1.30
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
311611611––––
Pawel Slosarczyk
Away
3.20
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
2–8Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 14:30 and never touched — 68.8% is still 68.8%
Graded at full timeMarcin Lach to win
68.8%
68.8%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
48 points played in total.
Set by set
311611611––––
H2H Marcin Lach 5–2 Pawel Slosarczyk Pawel Slosarczyk has won 2 of their 7 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 14:30What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.30 (71%)
Lach
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
5-2 in 7
Lach
Wrong
gap of 3 in 7, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Lach 1421 vs Slosarczyk 1188
Lach
Wrong
both rated, 233 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Lach 60% vs Slosarczyk 40%
Lach
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Lach 60% vs Slosarczyk 20%
Lach
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Lach +1 · Slosarczyk -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 76% — Strong (leans Lach) · live re-read · sealed at 69% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Lach form (60%) is below what odds imply (77%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsLach 1.30 / Slosarczyk 3.20
Signal prob.76% / 25%
Edge (Lach)+4.4pp
TT Elite Series · #13083020
Lach1.30
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite65% won 104 of 159
Up 2–0, closes it98% 61 of 62
Up 1–0, closes it80% 75 of 94
Slosarczyk3.20
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog31% won 98 of 313
Down 0–1, comes back15% 27 of 186
Down 0–2, comes back2% 2 of 114
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 7 meetings
HomeLach5wins
AwaySlosarczyk2wins
1 of 7 to a deciderLach leads 5–2, and 1 of those 7 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeLach83.3%5 of 6
AwaySlosarczykn = 1, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 7 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Lach6Slosarczyk1n = 7Lach took 6 of 7
S2Lach5Slosarczyk2n = 7Lach took 5 of 7
S3Lach4Slosarczyk3n = 7Lach took 4 of 7
S4Lach3Slosarczyk1n = 4Lach took 3 of 4
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 7 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 7 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home343%
3–1Four sets, home229%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away114%
1–3Four sets, away114%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 7 meetings
MetricLachSlosarczykL − SBasisWins52+3in 7 meetingsFirst set61+5of 7Avg pointsper match38.330.6+7.7per matchSweeps30+33–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricLachSlosarczykBasisWin rate · lifetime130 / 205 vs 307 / 80763.4%38%130 / 205 vs 307 / 807Avg sets wonper match2.41.7per matchAvg pointsper match38.835.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
LachLach 1.30/Slosarczyk 3.20
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
75.5%
Lach · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Slosarczyk won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record7
WSep 5 · 08:45M. Lach—1113113P. Slosarczyk—91140
WAug 30 · 09:50M. Lach—11911113P. Slosarczyk—411691
WAug 30 · 05:40M. Lach—11138113P. Slosarczyk—5111161
WJul 11 · 12:15M. Lach—1111113P. Slosarczyk—9570
WJul 11 · 08:35M. Lach—1111113P. Slosarczyk—9690
LJun 24 · 14:20M. Lach—711891P. Slosarczyk—11311113
LJun 24 · 08:10M. Lach—118711102P. Slosarczyk—411118123
M. Lach10
LSep 6 · 16:20M. Lach1.6071040R. Piechnik2.151112113WSep 6 · 15:05M. Lach1.65131112113R. Wojcik2.101161471WSep 6 · 13:55M. Lach1.6911511113W. Wojtaszczyk2.01411491WSep 6 · 12:45K. Slawinski1.75781181M. Lach1.9511118113LSep 6 · 11:55M. Lach1.86911991M. Oracz1.8011711113LSep 6 · 10:20M. Lach1.95811971K. Slawinski1.7011811113WSep 6 · 09:05M. Lach1.6311139113R. Wojcik2.108111111WSep 6 · 07:55M. Lach1.7111712123W. Wojtaszczyk2.0061110101WSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113LSep 6 · 05:55M. Lach—1012841M. Oracz—121011113
P. Slosarczyk10
WSep 6 · 08:45W. Pytlas1.371111111042P. Slosarczyk2.75136612113WSep 6 · 07:35P. Slosarczyk4.101311113K. Hetnar1.1811940LSep 6 · 06:25R. Idaczyk1.8581111123P. Slosarczyk1.851135101WSep 6 · 05:10K. Juszczyk1.309580P. Slosarczyk3.101111113LSep 6 · 03:35G. Sawicki2.5011614133P. Slosarczyk1.4441112111LSep 5 · 15:55P. Slosarczyk1.95610131192W. Buczynski1.741112117113WSep 5 · 14:45R. Piechnik1.8091111622P. Slosarczyk1.91118911113LSep 5 · 13:30J. Jesiek1.60811117113P. Slosarczyk2.1511381172WSep 5 · 11:55R. Idaczyk1.85491181P. Slosarczyk1.8211118113LSep 5 · 11:05R. Piechnik1.66881111113P. Slosarczyk2.0511117882
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.