TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13081966
Played Sep 5Finished
Roman Piechnik
Home
1.66
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 3
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
811811117118118
Pawel Slosarczyk
Away
2.05
At publish
Lost last 7Form at publish
1–9Last 10Lost last 7
The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:49 and never touched — 68.7% is still 68.7%
Graded at full timeRoman Piechnik to win
68.7%
68.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
94 points played in total.
Set by set
811811117118118
H2H Roman Piechnik 1–1 Pawel Slosarczyk Dead even across their 2 meetings.
Last 2 · 1–1Head to head
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 09:49What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.66 (55%)
Piechnik
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-1 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Piechnik 1297 vs Slosarczyk 1176
Piechnik
Correct
both rated, 121 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Piechnik 60% vs Slosarczyk 0%
Piechnik
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Piechnik 50% vs Slosarczyk 10%
Piechnik
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Piechnik +3 · Slosarczyk -5
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 56% — Slight lean (leans Piechnik) · live re-read · sealed at 69% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Slosarczyk form (0%) is below what odds imply (49%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsPiechnik 1.66 / Slosarczyk 2.05
Signal prob.56% / 44%
Edge (Piechnik)+0.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13081966
Piechnik1.66
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As favourite
Fewer than 10 matches in this role
Slosarczyk2.05
10%won 1 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 7
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog31% won 98 of 313
Down 0–1, comes back15% 27 of 186
Down 0–2, comes back2% 2 of 114
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomePiechnik1wins
AwaySlosarczyk1wins
1 of 2 to a deciderLevel at 1–1, and 1 of those 2 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home1
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away1
These 2 meetings
MetricPiechnikSlosarczykP − SBasisWins110in 2 meetingsFirst set02−2of 2Avg pointsper match39.541.5−2.0per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricPiechnikSlosarczykBasisWin rate · lifetime14 / 34 vs 305 / 80241.2%38%14 / 34 vs 305 / 802Avg sets wonper match1.61.7per matchAvg pointsper match35.035.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
PiechnikPiechnik 1.66/Slosarczyk 2.05
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
56.1%
Piechnik · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Piechnik won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
WSep 4 · 09:50R. Piechnik—8121111123P. Slosarczyk—111477102
LSep 4 · 05:40R. Piechnik—10690P. Slosarczyk—1211113
R. Piechnik10
WSep 6 · 16:20M. Lach1.6071040R. Piechnik2.151112113LSep 6 · 15:30K. Slawinski1.70911911113R. Piechnik2.0011211392WSep 6 · 14:45R. Piechnik1.501114113M. Oracz2.5091270LSep 6 · 13:10R. Piechnik2.258611101W. Wojtaszczyk1.5711115123WSep 6 · 12:20R. Wojcik1.68121111492R. Piechnik2.02149911113LSep 6 · 11:05R. Piechnik2.507116111M. Oracz1.4511911133LSep 6 · 09:30R. Piechnik2.6011811492K. Slawinski1.41511911113LSep 6 · 08:20R. Piechnik1.95714551R. Wojcik1.75111211113LSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113WSep 6 · 05:30R. Piechnik—1112133W. Wojtaszczyk—410110
P. Slosarczyk10
WSep 6 · 08:45W. Pytlas1.371111111042P. Slosarczyk2.75136612113WSep 6 · 07:35P. Slosarczyk4.101311113K. Hetnar1.1811940LSep 6 · 06:25R. Idaczyk1.8581111123P. Slosarczyk1.851135101WSep 6 · 05:10K. Juszczyk1.309580P. Slosarczyk3.101111113LSep 6 · 03:35G. Sawicki2.5011614133P. Slosarczyk1.4441112111WSep 5 · 17:05M. Lach1.303660P. Slosarczyk3.201111113LSep 5 · 15:55P. Slosarczyk1.95610131192W. Buczynski1.741112117113WSep 5 · 14:45R. Piechnik1.8091111622P. Slosarczyk1.91118911113LSep 5 · 13:30J. Jesiek1.60811117113P. Slosarczyk2.1511381172WSep 5 · 11:55R. Idaczyk1.85491181P. Slosarczyk1.8211118113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.