TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13081963
Played Sep 5Finished
Marcin Lach
Home
1.24
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 1
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
1151012911118811
Witold Buczynski
Away
3.80
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 3
The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:55 and never touched — 82.5% is still 82.5%
Graded at full timeMarcin Lach to win
82.5%
82.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
96 points played in total.
Set by set
1151012911118811
H2H Marcin Lach 9–2 Witold Buczynski Witold Buczynski has won 2 of their 11 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 09:55What took a side3 for · 2 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.24 (75%)
Lach
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
9-2 in 11
Lach
Wrong
gap of 7 in 11, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Lach 1431 vs Buczynski 1323
Lach
Wrong
both rated, 108 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Lach 60% vs Buczynski 80%
Buczynski
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Lach 70% vs Buczynski 60%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Lach +1 · Buczynski +3
Buczynski
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 82% — Strong (leans Lach) · live re-read · sealed at 83% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Buczynski form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (26%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsLach 1.24 / Buczynski 3.80
Signal prob.82% / 18%
Edge (Lach)+6.3pp
TT Elite Series · #13081963
Lach1.24
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite65% won 104 of 159
Up 2–0, closes it98% 61 of 62
Up 1–0, closes it80% 75 of 94
Buczynski3.80
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As underdog37% won 185 of 507
Down 0–1, comes back21% 64 of 301
Down 0–2, comes back5% 9 of 173
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeLach8wins
AwayBuczynski2wins
3 of 10 to a deciderLach leads 8–2, and 3 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeLach100%7 of 7
AwayBuczynski66.7%2 of 3
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Lach7Buczynski3n = 10Lach took 7 of 10
S2Lach8Buczynski2n = 10Lach took 8 of 10
S3Lach6Buczynski4n = 10Lach took 6 of 10
S4Lach4Buczynski3n = 7Lach took 4 of 7
S5Lach2Buczynski1n = 3Lach took 2 of 3
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home330%
3–1Four sets, home330%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away110%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricLachBuczynskiL − BBasisWins82+6in 10 meetingsFirst set73+4of 10Avg pointsper match41.132.6+8.5per matchSweeps30+33–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricLachBuczynskiBasisWin rate · lifetime128 / 201 vs 429 / 111363.7%38.5%128 / 201 vs 429 / 1113Avg sets wonper match2.41.8per matchAvg pointsper match38.936.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
LachLach 1.24/Buczynski 3.80
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
81.7%
Lach · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Buczynski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 5 · 07:10M. Lach—711115143W. Buczynski—113511122
WAug 22 · 13:55M. Lach—1111113W. Buczynski—4390
LAug 22 · 04:10M. Lach—811151182W. Buczynski—118175113
WAug 10 · 11:00M. Lach—1211123W. Buczynski—106100
WAug 10 · 04:55M. Lach—1111113W. Buczynski—6890
LAug 9 · 11:00M. Lach—111961W. Buczynski—11611113
WAug 9 · 04:55M. Lach—111011113W. Buczynski—212321
WJul 19 · 12:15M. Lach—11111211113W. Buczynski—99141362
WJul 19 · 08:35M. Lach—11118113W. Buczynski—961171
WJul 12 · 10:35M. Lach—11911113W. Buczynski—211931
M. Lach10
LSep 6 · 16:20M. Lach1.6071040R. Piechnik2.151112113WSep 6 · 15:05M. Lach1.65131112113R. Wojcik2.101161471WSep 6 · 13:55M. Lach1.6911511113W. Wojtaszczyk2.01411491WSep 6 · 12:45K. Slawinski1.75781181M. Lach1.9511118113LSep 6 · 11:55M. Lach1.86911991M. Oracz1.8011711113LSep 6 · 10:20M. Lach1.95811971K. Slawinski1.7011811113WSep 6 · 09:05M. Lach1.6311139113R. Wojcik2.108111111WSep 6 · 07:55M. Lach1.7111712123W. Wojtaszczyk2.0061110101WSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113LSep 6 · 05:55M. Lach—1012841M. Oracz—121011113
W. Buczynski10
WSep 5 · 16:40J. Jesiek1.7611690W. Buczynski1.901311113WSep 5 · 15:55P. Slosarczyk1.95610131192W. Buczynski1.741112117113WSep 5 · 13:55R. Idaczyk1.607114101W. Buczynski2.1011911123WSep 5 · 13:10R. Piechnik1.757990W. Buczynski1.951111113WSep 5 · 10:40K. Juszczyk1.407750W. Buczynski2.651111113WSep 5 · 09:55P. Slosarczyk1.9512441182W. Buczynski1.751011118113WSep 5 · 07:55R. Idaczyk1.7561181192W. Buczynski1.95116115113LSep 5 · 07:10M. Lach1.47711115143W. Buczynski2.45113511122WSep 5 · 05:30R. Piechnik—8790W. Buczynski—1111113LSep 2 · 17:05M. Rus2.701111113W. Buczynski1.377890
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.