TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #12414575
Played Aug 14Finished
Tomas Franek
Home
2.00
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 1
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
51111812105111012
Martin Huk
Away
1.73
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 17:51 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeMartin Huk to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingTomas Franek above · Martin Huk below
Set 1 · 5-11
Set 2 · 11-8
Set 3 · 12-10
Set 4 · 5-11
Set 5 · 10-12
Point 95 set 5, 10-12 — our read held Martin Huk at 54.0%
95 points played in total.
H2H Tomas Franek 4–6 Martin Huk Tomas Franek has won 4 of their 10 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 17:51What took a side3 for · 0 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.73 (54%)
Huk
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
4-6 in 10
Huk
Correct
gap of 2 in 10, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Franek 1645 vs Huk 1669
Huk
Correct
both rated, 24 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Franek 60% vs Huk 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Franek 40% vs Huk 40%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Franek -1 · Huk -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 56% — Slight lean (leans Huk) · live re-read · sealed at 54% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsFranek 2.00 / Huk 1.73
Signal prob.44% / 56%
Edge (Huk)+2.5pp
Czech Liga Pro · #12414575
Franek2.00
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog42% won 21 of 50
Down 0–1, comes back20% 5 of 25
Down 0–2, comes back12% 2 of 17
Huk1.73
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite51% won 179 of 350
Up 2–0, closes it96% 78 of 81
Up 1–0, closes it72% 134 of 185
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeFranek4wins
AwayHuk6wins
4 of 10 to a deciderHuk leads 6–4, and 4 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeFranekn = 2, below the 3 needed
AwayHuk75%6 of 8
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Franek2Huk8n = 10Huk took 8 of 10
S2Franek7Huk3n = 10Franek took 7 of 10
S3Franek4Huk6n = 10Huk took 6 of 10
S4Franek6Huk3n = 9Franek took 6 of 9
S5Franek1Huk3n = 4Huk took 3 of 4
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home330%
3–2Decider, home110%
2–3Decider, away330%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away110%
These 10 meetings
MetricFranekHukF − HBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set28−6of 10Avg pointsper match40.242.4−2.2per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricFranekHukBasisWin rate · lifetime79 / 157 vs 812 / 166550.3%48.8%79 / 157 vs 812 / 1665Avg sets wonper match2.02.0per matchAvg pointsper match37.538.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HukFranek 2.00/Huk 1.73
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
56.2%
Huk · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Huk won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LJul 2 · 24:00T. Franek—51050M. Huk—1112113
WJun 24 · 03:30T. Franek—111114113M. Huk—961651
WJun 24 · 24:30T. Franek—571111113M. Huk—11119782
LJun 20 · 23:00T. Franek—61171482M. Huk—1191112113
LJun 2 · 22:00T. Franek—811128102M. Huk—1151011123
LMay 29 · 23:00T. Franek—811961M. Huk—11511113
LMay 24 · 23:30T. Franek—1012591M. Huk—121011113
WMay 21 · 02:00T. Franek—61111113M. Huk—119981
WMay 13 · 02:00T. Franek—11711113M. Huk—911651
LFeb 6 · 24:00T. Franek—91281432M. Huk—11101112113
T. Franek10
LSep 4 · 02:58T. Franek1.676850M. Klement2.101111113LSep 4 · 01:30T. Franek2.1041060J. Simecek1.671112113LSep 4 · 24:30M. Klement2.20911136113T. Franek1.61119111152WSep 3 · 23:30M. Wagner1.67781161T. Franek2.1011118113WSep 3 · 22:30T. Franek1.911111113M. Sychra1.809990LSep 2 · 02:30T. Franek2.10761191V. Vejvoda1.6711113113LSep 2 · 01:30S. Kasnik1.4491411123T. Franek2.6311126101LSep 2 · 24:00T. Franek1.67591191M. Sychra2.1011113113WSep 1 · 23:00M. Klement2.10119781T. Franek1.6781111113LAug 14 · 02:00T. Franek2.25113471R. Urbaniec1.5771111113
M. Huk10
WSep 3 · 13:29M. Zahradka1.6110131081M. Huk2.20121112113WSep 3 · 12:30M. Huk1.8312119113J. Ruzicka1.831071191LSep 3 · 11:00M. Huk1.91711561M. Zahradka1.8011911113WSep 3 · 10:00E. Mares1.4461114662M. Huk2.631151211113LSep 3 · 09:28M. Zahradka1.801111113M. Huk1.915750LSep 3 · 08:00M. Zahradka1.73511114123M. Huk2.00118711102WSep 3 · 07:00M. Klimenta1.80118681M. Huk1.9141111113WSep 3 · 06:30M. Huk1.801171011113J. Ruzicka1.9161112772WSep 2 · 21:28J. Kycelt1.50116871M. Huk2.5041111113WSep 2 · 20:30M. Huk1.83118116113J. Ruzicka1.8331181152
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.