Form at publish
2 – 3
Set by set
Form at publish
Milan Smesny to win
57.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
RightSent to Pro: Andrii Tkachenko @ 2.20 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Set 1 · 11-9
Set 2 · 1-11
Set 3 · 7-11
Set 4 · 12-10
Set 5 · 9-11
Point 92 set 5, 9-11 · our read held Milan Smesny at 57.7%
92 points played in total.
Sent to Pro: Andrii Tkachenko @ 2.20 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together: one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
Sent to Pro: Andrii Tkachenko @ 2.20 · Lost
57.7%Our read61.9%to break even at 1.615
short by 4.2pp61.9% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.615 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 1 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands: it is the only comparison available.
Today's board has its reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 08:09 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded