Form at publish
3 – 1
Set by set
Form at publish
Milan Smesny to win
61.9%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
WrongSent to Pro: Milan Smesny @ 1.50 · Lost
Set 1 · 11-6
Set 2 · 7-11
Set 3 · 11-7
Set 4 · 11-6
Point 70 set 4, 11-6 · our read held Milan Smesny at 61.9%
70 points played in total.
H2H Ladislav Novotny 7–18 Milan Smesny Ladislav Novotny has won 7 of their 25 meetings.
Sent to Pro: Milan Smesny @ 1.50 · Lost
Sent to Pro: Milan Smesny @ 1.50 · Lost
61.9%Our read66.7%to break even at 1.50
short by 4.8pp66.7% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.50 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 1 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 05:56 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded