TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13110330
Played Sep 11Finished
Jaroslav Peter
Home
1.83
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 4
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
1191614117––––
Antonin Schneeberger
Away
1.83
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 15:34 and never touched — 55.4% is still 55.4%
Graded at full timeJaroslav Peter to win
55.4%
55.4%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingJaroslav Peter above · Antonin Schneeberger below
Set 1 · 11-9
Set 2 · 16-14
Set 3 · 11-7
Point 68 set 3, 11-7 — our read held Jaroslav Peter at 55.4%
68 points played in total.
H2H Jaroslav Peter 1–1 Antonin Schneeberger Dead even across their 2 meetings.
Last 2 · 1–1Head to head
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 15:34What took a side4 for · 1 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.83 (50%)
Schneeberger
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-1 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Peter 1387 vs Schneeberger 1307
Peter
Correct
both rated, 81 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Peter 80% vs Schneeberger 60%
Peter
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Peter 70% vs Schneeberger 50%
Peter
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Peter +4 · Schneeberger +1
Peter
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Peter) · live re-read · sealed at 55% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Peter form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (55%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsPeter 1.83 / Schneeberger 1.83
Signal prob.54% / 46%
Edge (Peter)+4.0pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13110330
Peter1.83
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
Schneeberger1.83
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomePeter1wins
AwaySchneeberger1wins
2 of 2 to a deciderLevel at 1–1, and 2 of those 2 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home1
2–3Decider, away1
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away0
These 2 meetings
MetricPeterSchneebergerP − SBasisWins110in 2 meetingsFirst set20+2of 2Avg pointsper match48.547.0+1.5per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricPeterSchneebergerBasisWin rate · lifetime32 / 87 vs 111 / 24536.8%45.3%32 / 87 vs 111 / 245Avg sets wonper match1.72.0per matchAvg pointsper match36.537.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
PeterPeter 1.83/Schneeberger 1.83
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
54%
Peter · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Peter won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LAug 14 · 21:00J. Peter—11117852A. Schneeberger—741111113
WAug 14 · 18:30J. Peter—1213811113A. Schneeberger—101511862
J. Peter10
WAug 28 · 21:28J. Peter1.331611113D. Kolek3.2514690WAug 28 · 20:00J. Peter1.571211113D. Kolek2.2510640WAug 28 · 19:30D. Tyn2.2511114582J. Peter1.57791111113WAug 28 · 18:00J. Peter2.1061111123Z. Zientek1.671178101LAug 15 · 17:28J. Peter2.633101161M. Levicky1.4411127103WAug 15 · 16:00D. Kolek1.73121060J. Peter2.001412113WAug 15 · 15:00M. Kolek1.73391181J. Peter2.001111793WAug 15 · 14:30J. Peter2.631061111113M. Levicky1.4412118782LAug 14 · 21:00J. Peter1.8311117852A. Schneeberger1.83741111113LAug 14 · 20:00D. Kolek1.8311126113J. Peter1.838101191
A. Schneeberger10
WSep 6 · 09:00A. Schneeberger1.4411111010113M. Levicky2.6346121292LSep 6 · 08:00D. Priesol1.7311711113A. Schneeberger2.00411581LSep 6 · 07:00D. Tyn3.50611125113A. Schneeberger1.28119101192WSep 6 · 06:30A. Schneeberger1.731111113M. Levicky2.005790WAug 14 · 21:00J. Peter1.8311117852A. Schneeberger1.83741111113LAug 14 · 20:30M. Kolek2.00114118113A. Schneeberger1.7381191192LAug 14 · 19:30A. Schneeberger1.367111311102D. Kolek3.00118156123LAug 14 · 18:30J. Peter2.631213811113A. Schneeberger1.44101511862WAug 13 · 09:30A. Schneeberger1.361111113D. Tyn3.007840WAug 13 · 08:30A. Schneeberger1.441111113D. Tyn2.634770
Upcoming Matches
J. Peter
A. Schneeberger
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.