TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13096926
Played Sep 8Finished
Jakub Glanowski
Home
2.01
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 1
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
1188119111181113
Artur Sobel
Away
1.66
At publish
Won last 6Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 6
The read, and what happenedsealed at 03:19 and never touched — 58.7% is still 58.7%
Graded at full timeArtur Sobel to win
58.7%
58.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
101 points played in total.
Set by set
1188119111181113
H2H Jakub Glanowski 35–37 Artur Sobel Jakub Glanowski has won 35 of their 72 meetings.
Last 10 · 5–5Head to head
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 03:19What took a side6 for · 0 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.66 (55%)
Sobel
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
35-37 in 72
Sobel
Correct
gap of 2 in 72, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Glanowski 1405 vs Sobel 1556
Sobel
Correct
both rated, 152 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Glanowski 40% vs Sobel 100%
Sobel
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Glanowski 30% vs Sobel 60%
Sobel
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Glanowski -1 · Sobel +5
Sobel
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
6 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 58% — Slight lean (leans Sobel) · live re-read · sealed at 59% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Sobel form (100%) outperforms what odds imply (60%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsGlanowski 2.01 / Sobel 1.66
Signal prob.42% / 58%
Edge (Sobel)+2.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13096926
Glanowski2.01
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog42% won 162 of 390
Down 0–1, comes back21% 42 of 196
Down 0–2, comes back3% 3 of 105
Sobel1.66
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 6
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite55% won 176 of 320
Up 2–0, closes it92% 73 of 79
Up 1–0, closes it76% 126 of 165
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeGlanowski5wins
AwaySobel5wins
6 of 10 to a deciderLevel at 5–5, and 6 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeGlanowski71.4%5 of 7
AwaySobel100%3 of 3
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Glanowski7Sobel3n = 10Glanowski took 7 of 10
S2Glanowski2Sobel8n = 10Sobel took 8 of 10
S3Glanowski5Sobel5n = 10split evenly
S4Glanowski2Sobel6n = 8Sobel took 6 of 8
S5Glanowski4Sobel2n = 6Glanowski took 4 of 6
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home110%
3–2Decider, home440%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away110%
0–3Straight, away220%
These 10 meetings
MetricGlanowskiSobelG − SBasisWins550in 10 meetingsFirst set73+4of 10Avg pointsper match44.344.9−0.6per matchSweeps02−23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricGlanowskiSobelBasisWin rate · lifetime881 / 1792 vs 639 / 119149.2%53.7%881 / 1792 vs 639 / 1191Avg sets wonper match2.02.2per matchAvg pointsper match38.939.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
SobelGlanowski 2.01/Sobel 1.66
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
57.6%
Sobel · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Sobel won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LAug 11 · 11:25J. Glanowski—101190A. Sobel—1213113
WAug 11 · 08:05J. Glanowski—11611113A. Sobel—811891
WAug 10 · 09:50J. Glanowski—1113115113A. Sobel—71571192
WJul 20 · 13:55J. Glanowski—111473113A. Sobel—712111152
LJun 30 · 06:30J. Glanowski—81111692A. Sobel—118711113
WJun 30 · 04:10J. Glanowski—14101114113A. Sobel—121271682
LJun 1 · 01:05J. Glanowski—115891A. Sobel—71111113
LMay 31 · 22:40J. Glanowski—20970A. Sobel—2211113
WMay 31 · 20:35J. Glanowski—11111111113A. Sobel—71381372
LMay 11 · 14:40J. Glanowski—117101192A. Sobel—911124113
J. Glanowski10
LSep 8 · 12:40J. Glanowski1.861175111A. Lilien1.8371111133WSep 8 · 11:25J. Glanowski1.511111128113A. Myszewski2.2887141192LSep 8 · 10:10S. Brud1.75619612143J. Glanowski1.9511171110122LSep 8 · 09:25J. Glanowski1.87118781B. Sulkowski1.8351111113WSep 8 · 08:35J. Glanowski1.901523911173A. Linek1.801325118152WSep 8 · 06:55J. Glanowski1.471991111113D. Wrobel2.40171113972LSep 8 · 05:40J. Glanowski1.708950R. Stapor1.911111113LSep 8 · 04:10J. Glanowski1.90711119112K. Sulkowski1.75116711133LSep 8 · 03:00J. Glanowski1.605111151A. Myszewski2.0611913113LSep 4 · 24:10J. Kuzmicz1.221111113J. Glanowski4.007890
A. Sobel10
WSep 8 · 13:05S. Brud1.861110111172A. Sobel1.80512813113WSep 8 · 12:15A. Sobel1.60111110113B. Sulkowski2.15961261WSep 8 · 10:35A. Sobel1.431111113A. Myszewski2.505890WSep 8 · 09:50A. Lilien2.00351391A. Sobel1.70111111113WSep 8 · 08:30A. Sobel3.50811811113M. Sklensky1.2511411592WSep 8 · 06:50A. Sobel1.861071111113S. Brud1.8012116572LSep 8 · 05:35A. Sobel1.801011891M. Minda1.8512211113LSep 8 · 04:00A. Sobel1.80114751B. Czerwinski1.9071111113LSep 8 · 03:00A. Sobel1.707101131A. Lilien1.9511127113LSep 7 · 14:40A. Sobel1.77121112742S. Brud1.951091411113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.