TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13095161
Played Sep 8Finished
Jakub Glanowski
Home
1.87
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
3–7Last 10Won last 2
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
115811711811––
Bartosz Sulkowski
Away
1.83
At publish
Lost last 4Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 22:00 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeBartosz Sulkowski to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
72 points played in total.
Set by set
115811711811––
H2H Jakub Glanowski 15–10 Bartosz Sulkowski Bartosz Sulkowski has won 10 of their 25 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 22:00What took a side2 for · 3 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.83 (51%)
Sulkowski
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
15-10 in 25
Glanowski
Wrong
gap of 5 in 25, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Glanowski 1429 vs Sulkowski 1407
Glanowski
Wrong
both rated, 23 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Glanowski 40% vs Sulkowski 20%
Glanowski
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Glanowski 30% vs Sulkowski 40%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Glanowski +2 · Sulkowski -4
Sulkowski
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Glanowski) · live re-read · sealed at 46% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Sulkowski form (20%) is below what odds imply (55%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsGlanowski 1.87 / Sulkowski 1.83
Signal prob.54% / 46%
Edge (Glanowski)+4.5pp
TT Elite Series · #13095161
Glanowski1.87
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog42% won 162 of 390
Down 0–1, comes back21% 42 of 196
Down 0–2, comes back3% 3 of 105
Sulkowski1.83
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 4
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As favourite58% won 211 of 362
Up 2–0, closes it98% 97 of 99
Up 1–0, closes it82% 154 of 188
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeGlanowski7wins
AwaySulkowski3wins
6 of 10 to a deciderGlanowski leads 7–3, and 6 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeGlanowski80%4 of 5
AwaySulkowski40%2 of 5
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Glanowski5Sulkowski5n = 10split evenly
S2Glanowski6Sulkowski4n = 10Glanowski took 6 of 10
S3Glanowski7Sulkowski3n = 10Glanowski took 7 of 10
S4Glanowski4Sulkowski6n = 10Sulkowski took 6 of 10
S5Glanowski4Sulkowski2n = 6Glanowski took 4 of 6
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home330%
3–2Decider, home440%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away110%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricGlanowskiSulkowskiG − SBasisWins73+4in 10 meetingsFirst set550of 10Avg pointsper match44.442.2+2.2per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricGlanowskiSulkowskiBasisWin rate · lifetime882 / 1793 vs 540 / 122549.2%44.1%882 / 1793 vs 540 / 1225Avg sets wonper match2.01.9per matchAvg pointsper match38.937.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
GlanowskiGlanowski 1.87/Sulkowski 1.83
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
54%
Glanowski · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Sulkowski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WAug 26 · 06:25J. Glanowski—151111123B. Sulkowski—1789101
WAug 25 · 05:40J. Glanowski—711119113B. Sulkowski—11851162
WAug 20 · 12:15J. Glanowski—711115123B. Sulkowski—119511102
WJul 26 · 19:40J. Glanowski—11611113B. Sulkowski—711971
LJul 11 · 10:55J. Glanowski—117811102B. Sulkowski—711118123
WJul 9 · 07:40J. Glanowski—118117113B. Sulkowski—51191162
LJul 1 · 08:05J. Glanowski—611115132B. Sulkowski—116811153
WJul 1 · 05:35J. Glanowski—119114113B. Sulkowski—81161122
WJun 16 · 13:30J. Glanowski—11115113B. Sulkowski—981191
LMay 12 · 13:55J. Glanowski—811981B. Sulkowski—11711113
J. Glanowski10
LSep 8 · 13:55J. Glanowski2.01118911112A. Sobel1.66811118133LSep 8 · 12:40J. Glanowski1.861175111A. Lilien1.8371111133WSep 8 · 11:25J. Glanowski1.511111128113A. Myszewski2.2887141192LSep 8 · 10:10S. Brud1.75619612143J. Glanowski1.9511171110122WSep 8 · 08:35J. Glanowski1.901523911173A. Linek1.801325118152WSep 8 · 06:55J. Glanowski1.471991111113D. Wrobel2.40171113972LSep 8 · 05:40J. Glanowski1.708950R. Stapor1.911111113LSep 8 · 04:10J. Glanowski1.90711119112K. Sulkowski1.75116711133LSep 8 · 03:00J. Glanowski1.605111151A. Myszewski2.0611913113LSep 4 · 24:10J. Kuzmicz1.221111113J. Glanowski4.007890
B. Sulkowski10
LSep 9 · 07:40B. Sulkowski2.45851131D. Solilo1.4511118113LSep 9 · 06:25B. Sulkowski2.206870P. Blocho1.571111113WSep 9 · 05:15B. Sulkowski1.8291111113R. Stapor1.90118661WSep 9 · 04:00M. Minda1.73711941B. Sulkowski1.9811911113LSep 9 · 03:20B. Sulkowski2.301051181B. Czerwinski1.5512118113WSep 8 · 14:40S. Brud1.60611961B. Sulkowski2.1511711113LSep 8 · 13:30B. Sulkowski1.7431151182A. Myszewski1.95115116113LSep 8 · 12:15A. Sobel1.60111110113B. Sulkowski2.15961261WSep 8 · 11:00A. Lilien1.8010911111B. Sulkowski1.9012116133LSep 8 · 24:35B. Sulkowski3.75811781K. Kapik1.2511211113
Upcoming Matches
J. Glanowski
B. Sulkowski
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.