Form at publish
3 – 2
Set by set
Form at publish
Jiri Dedek to win
64.4%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
WrongSent to Pro: Adam Svoboda @ 3.00 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Set 1 · 9-11
Set 2 · 11-6
Set 3 · 4-11
Set 4 · 11-9
Set 5 · 11-8
Point 91 set 5, 11-8 · our read held Jiri Dedek at 64.4%
91 points played in total.
H2H Adam Svoboda 0–2 Jiri Dedek Adam Svoboda has won 0 of their 2 meetings.
Sent to Pro: Adam Svoboda @ 3.00 · Lost
64.4%Our read73.4%to break even at 1.363
short by 9.0pp73.4% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.363 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 1 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Sent to Pro: Adam Svoboda @ 3.00 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 18:03 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded