TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13081550
Played Sep 5Finished
Marcin Lach
Home
1.33
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
1191311114––––
Pawel Slosarczyk
Away
3.10
At publish
Lost last 5Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 5
The read, and what happenedsealed at 07:58 and never touched — 74.0% is still 74.0%
Graded at full timeMarcin Lach to win
74.0%
74.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
59 points played in total.
Set by set
1191311114––––
H2H Marcin Lach 4–2 Pawel Slosarczyk Pawel Slosarczyk has won 2 of their 6 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 07:58What took a side5 for · 1 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.33 (70%)
Lach
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
4-2 in 6
Lach
Correct
gap of 2 in 6, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Lach 1431 vs Slosarczyk 1191
Lach
Correct
both rated, 240 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Lach 60% vs Slosarczyk 0%
Lach
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Lach 70% vs Slosarczyk 30%
Lach
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Lach +1 · Slosarczyk -5
Slosarczyk
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 74% — Strong (leans Lach)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Slosarczyk form (0%) is below what odds imply (32%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsLach 1.33 / Slosarczyk 3.10
Signal prob.74% / 26%
Edge (Lach)+4.0pp
TT Elite Series · #13081550
Lach1.33
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite65% won 104 of 159
Up 2–0, closes it98% 61 of 62
Up 1–0, closes it80% 75 of 94
Slosarczyk3.10
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 5
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog31% won 98 of 313
Down 0–1, comes back15% 27 of 186
Down 0–2, comes back2% 2 of 114
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 6 meetings
HomeLach4wins
AwaySlosarczyk2wins
1 of 6 to a deciderLach leads 4–2, and 1 of those 6 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeLach80%4 of 5
AwaySlosarczykn = 1, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 6 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Lach5Slosarczyk1n = 6Lach took 5 of 6
S2Lach4Slosarczyk2n = 6Lach took 4 of 6
S3Lach3Slosarczyk3n = 6split evenly
S4Lach3Slosarczyk1n = 4Lach took 3 of 4
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 6 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 6 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home233%
3–1Four sets, home233%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away117%
1–3Four sets, away117%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 6 meetings
MetricLachSlosarczykL − SBasisWins42+2in 6 meetingsFirst set51+4of 6Avg pointsper match38.831.7+7.1per matchSweeps20+23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricLachSlosarczykBasisWin rate · lifetime126 / 198 vs 305 / 80063.6%38.1%126 / 198 vs 305 / 800Avg sets wonper match2.41.7per matchAvg pointsper match38.835.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
LachLach 1.33/Slosarczyk 3.10
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
74%
Lach · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Lach won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record6
WAug 30 · 09:50M. Lach—11911113P. Slosarczyk—411691
WAug 30 · 05:40M. Lach—11138113P. Slosarczyk—5111161
WJul 11 · 12:15M. Lach—1111113P. Slosarczyk—9570
WJul 11 · 08:35M. Lach—1111113P. Slosarczyk—9690
LJun 24 · 14:20M. Lach—711891P. Slosarczyk—11311113
LJun 24 · 08:10M. Lach—118711102P. Slosarczyk—411118123
M. Lach10
LSep 6 · 16:20M. Lach1.6071040R. Piechnik2.151112113WSep 6 · 15:05M. Lach1.65131112113R. Wojcik2.101161471WSep 6 · 13:55M. Lach1.6911511113W. Wojtaszczyk2.01411491WSep 6 · 12:45K. Slawinski1.75781181M. Lach1.9511118113LSep 6 · 11:55M. Lach1.86911991M. Oracz1.8011711113LSep 6 · 10:20M. Lach1.95811971K. Slawinski1.7011811113WSep 6 · 09:05M. Lach1.6311139113R. Wojcik2.108111111WSep 6 · 07:55M. Lach1.7111712123W. Wojtaszczyk2.0061110101WSep 6 · 06:45R. Piechnik2.5510111161M. Lach1.4612913113LSep 6 · 05:55M. Lach—1012841M. Oracz—121011113
P. Slosarczyk10
WSep 6 · 08:45W. Pytlas1.371111111042P. Slosarczyk2.75136612113WSep 6 · 07:35P. Slosarczyk4.101311113K. Hetnar1.1811940LSep 6 · 06:25R. Idaczyk1.8581111123P. Slosarczyk1.851135101WSep 6 · 05:10K. Juszczyk1.309580P. Slosarczyk3.101111113LSep 6 · 03:35G. Sawicki2.5011614133P. Slosarczyk1.4441112111WSep 5 · 17:05M. Lach1.303660P. Slosarczyk3.201111113LSep 5 · 15:55P. Slosarczyk1.95610131192W. Buczynski1.741112117113WSep 5 · 14:45R. Piechnik1.8091111622P. Slosarczyk1.91118911113LSep 5 · 13:30J. Jesiek1.60811117113P. Slosarczyk2.1511381172WSep 5 · 11:55R. Idaczyk1.85491181P. Slosarczyk1.8211118113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.