Form at publish
2 – 3
Set by set
Form at publish
Pavel Chvatal to win
63.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
Set 1 · 11-9
Set 2 · 8-11
Set 3 · 7-11
Set 4 · 14-12
Set 5 · 9-11
Point 103 set 5, 9-11 · our read held Pavel Chvatal at 63.6%
103 points played in total.
These two have never met.
The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together: one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.
63.6%Our read65.2%to break even at 1.533
short by 1.6pp65.2% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.533 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 4 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands: it is the only comparison available.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 19:04 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded