Form at publish
3 – 0
Set by set
Form at publish
Jan Simecek to win
72.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
RightSent to Pro: Radim Urbaniec @ 3.00 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Set 1 · 12-10
Set 2 · 11-4
Set 3 · 13-11
Point 61 set 3, 13-11 · our read held Jan Simecek at 72.3%
61 points played in total.
H2H Jan Simecek 10–1 Radim Urbaniec Radim Urbaniec has won 1 of their 11 meetings.
Sent to Pro: Radim Urbaniec @ 3.00 · Lost
72.3%Our read73.4%to break even at 1.363
short by 1.1pp73.4% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.363 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
Sent to Pro: Radim Urbaniec @ 3.00 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.
Today's board has its reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 02:04 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded