Form at publish
3 – 0
Set by set
Form at publish
Martin Cerny to win
56.8%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
WrongSent to Pro: Martin Cerny @ 1.73 · Lost
Set 1 · 11-9
Set 2 · 11-7
Set 3 · 11-9
Point 58 set 3, 11-9 · our read held Martin Cerny at 56.8%
58 points played in total.
H2H David Vesecky 57–82 Martin Cerny David Vesecky has won 57 of their 139 meetings.
Same-day rematch · 4h before this match
Vesecky beat Cerny 3-0.
Same-day rematch winners hit ~50% historically. The market typically prices this in, which is why it moves nothing in the read below: it is context, not a signal.
56.8%Our read60.6%to break even at 1.65
short by 3.8pp60.6% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.65 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent, and the gate let it through as Confirm.
Sent to Pro: Martin Cerny @ 1.73 · Lost
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.
Today's board has its reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 13:31 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded