Form at publish
1 – 3
Set by set
Form at publish
Petr David to win
65.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
WrongSent to Pro: Petr David @ 1.50 · Lost
Set 1 · 12-10
Set 2 · 3-11
Set 3 · 9-11
Set 4 · 9-11
Point 76 set 4, 9-11 · our read held Petr David at 65.7%
76 points played in total.
H2H Petr David 15–15 Dawid Michna Dead even across their 30 meetings.
Same-day rematch · 16h before this match
Michna beat David 3-1.
Same-day rematch winners hit ~50% historically. The market typically prices this in, which is why it moves nothing in the read below: it is context, not a signal.
Sent to Pro: Petr David @ 1.50 · Lost
65.7%Our read66.7%to break even at 1.50
short by 1.0pp66.7% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.50 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
Sent to Pro: Petr David @ 1.50 · Lost
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 01:37 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded