Form at publish
3 – 2
Set by set
Form at publish
Zbigniew Nocun to win
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
WrongSent to Pro: Artur Kubiak @ 2.00 · Won
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Set 1 · 12-10
Set 2 · 6-11
Set 3 · 6-11
Set 4 · 11-5
Set 5 · 11-3
Point 86 set 5, 11-3 · our read held Zbigniew Nocun at 54.0%
86 points played in total.
H2H Artur Kubiak 32–28 Zbigniew Nocun Zbigniew Nocun has won 28 of their 60 meetings.
Same-day rematch · 6h before this match
Kubiak beat Nocun 3-0.
Same-day rematch winners hit ~50% historically. The market typically prices this in, which is why it moves nothing in the read below: it is context, not a signal.
Sent to Pro: Artur Kubiak @ 2.00 · Won
54.0%Our read57.9%to break even at 1.727
short by 3.9pp57.9% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.727 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 2 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
Sent to Pro: Artur Kubiak @ 2.00 · Won
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.
Today's board has its reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 01:26 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded