Mateusz Woskowicz vs Radoslaw Chrzescian 0-3

TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series

TT Elite SeriesMatch #13154902

Played Sep 19Finished

Mateusz Woskowicz

Home

2.75

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

2–8Last 10Won last 1

Final

0 – 3

Set by set

3111012711––––

Radoslaw Chrzescian

Away

1.40

At publish

Won last 5

Form at publish

9–1Last 10Won last 5

The read, and what happenedsealed at 17:05 and never touched — 58.1% is still 58.1%

Graded at full time

Radoslaw Chrzescian to win

58.1%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.

How it is goingMateusz Woskowicz above · Radoslaw Chrzescian below

Set 1 · 3-11

Set 2 · 10-12

Set 3 · 7-11

Point 54 set 3, 7-11 — our read held Radoslaw Chrzescian at 58.1%

54 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 17:05

What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.40 (66%)

Chrzescian

Correct

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Woskowicz 1399 vs Chrzescian 1660

Chrzescian

Correct

both rated, 261 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Woskowicz 40% vs Chrzescian 100%

Chrzescian

Correct

60pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Woskowicz 20% vs Chrzescian 90%

Chrzescian

Correct

70pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Woskowicz +1 · Chrzescian +5

Chrzescian

Correct

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 66% — Clear lean (leans Chrzescian) · live re-read · sealed at 58% before the first serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Chrzescian form (100%) outperforms what odds imply (71%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsWoskowicz 2.75 / Chrzescian 1.40

Signal prob.34% / 66%

Edge (Chrzescian)+0.0pp

TT Elite Series · #13154902

Woskowicz2.75

20%won 2 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

As underdog35% won 9 of 26

Down 0–1, comes back19% 3 of 16

Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 9

Chrzescian1.40

90%won 9 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

Won last 5

oldest → newest

60%takes the first set · 6 of 10

As favourite76% won 58 of 76

Up 2–0, closes it93% 28 of 30

Up 1–0, closes it90% 45 of 50

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricWoskowiczChrzescianBasisWin rate · lifetime125 / 236 vs 180 / 34653%52%125 / 236 vs 180 / 346Avg sets wonper match2.22.0per matchAvg pointsper match40.337.7per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Chrzescian

Woskowicz 2.75/Chrzescian 1.40

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

66.3%

Chrzescian · sealed before the serve

What happened

0–3

Chrzescian won

Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

M. Woskowicz10