TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13144621
Played Sep 17Finished
Waldemar Glanowski
Home
2.97
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
611115311611––
Kacper Slawinski
Away
1.35
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 05:23 and never touched — 62.2% is still 62.2%
Graded at full timeKacper Slawinski to win
62.2%
62.2%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
64 points played in total.
Set by set
611115311611––
H2H Waldemar Glanowski 0–5 Kacper Slawinski Waldemar Glanowski has won 0 of their 5 meetings.
Same-day rematch · 6h before this match
Slawinski beat Glanowski 3-0.
Same-day rematch winners hit ~50% historically — the market typically prices this in. Which is why it moves nothing in the read below: it is context, not a signal.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 05:23What took a side3 for · 1 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.35 (69%)
Slawinski
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-5 in 5
Slawinski
Correct
gap of 5 in 5, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Glanowski 1270 vs Slawinski 1460
Slawinski
Correct
both rated, 190 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Glanowski 60% vs Slawinski 40%
Glanowski
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Glanowski 50% vs Slawinski 50%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Glanowski +1 · Slawinski -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 73% — Strong (leans Slawinski) · live re-read · sealed at 62% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Slawinski form (40%) is below what odds imply (74%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsGlanowski 2.97 / Slawinski 1.35
Signal prob.27% / 73%
Edge (Slawinski)+4.5pp
TT Elite Series · #13144621
Glanowski2.97
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog33% won 77 of 233
Down 0–1, comes back14% 17 of 120
Down 0–2, comes back5% 3 of 67
Slawinski1.35
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite70% won 121 of 174
Up 2–0, closes it98% 56 of 57
Up 1–0, closes it82% 88 of 107
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 5 meetings
HomeGlanowski0wins
AwaySlawinski5wins
1 of 5 to a deciderSlawinski leads 5–0, and 1 of those 5 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeGlanowskin = 2, below the 3 needed
AwaySlawinski100%3 of 3
Set by set, in these 5 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Glanowski2Slawinski3n = 5Slawinski took 3 of 5
S2Glanowski2Slawinski3n = 5Slawinski took 3 of 5
S3Glanowski1Slawinski4n = 5Slawinski took 4 of 5
S4Glanowski0Slawinski4n = 4Slawinski took 4 of 4
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 5 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 5 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away120%
1–3Four sets, away360%
0–3Straight, away120%
These 5 meetings
MetricGlanowskiSlawinskiG − SBasisWins05−5in 5 meetingsFirst set23−1of 5Avg pointsper match34.041.0−7.0per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricGlanowskiSlawinskiBasisWin rate · lifetime396 / 742 vs 627 / 101453.4%61.8%396 / 742 vs 627 / 1014Avg sets wonper match2.12.2per matchAvg pointsper match37.538.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
SlawinskiGlanowski 2.97/Slawinski 1.35
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
73.2%
Slawinski · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Slawinski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record5
LSep 17 · 09:05W. Glanowski2771190K. Slawinski351113113
LSep 3 · 12:45W. Glanowski388111181K. Slawinski4111613113
LSep 3 · 10:20W. Glanowski48811111082K. Slawinski42113512113
LAug 13 · 13:10W. Glanowski25114281K. Slawinski4291111113
LAug 13 · 05:30W. Glanowski321236111K. Slawinski45101111133
W. Glanowski10
LSep 17 · 16:20W. Glanowski2.232970K. Schaniel1.531111113WSep 17 · 13:55W. Glanowski2.059111011113M. Baron1.6511612392LSep 17 · 12:45W. Buczynski1.8481111133W. Glanowski1.801199111WSep 17 · 11:55W. Glanowski2.001111113O. Sokolowski1.704960WSep 17 · 10:20W. Glanowski1.8571111113W. Buczynski1.78115651LSep 17 · 09:05W. Glanowski3.3071190K. Slawinski1.251113113LSep 17 · 07:55W. Glanowski2.17910111192M. Baron1.56111258113WSep 17 · 06:45K. Schaniel1.57119891W. Glanowski2.1581111113LSep 17 · 05:55W. Glanowski2.10811791O. Sokolowski1.6011911113LSep 10 · 16:20W. Glanowski2.6041080K. Adamus1.411112113
K. Slawinski10
WSep 17 · 16:40K. Slawinski1.391111113M. Baron2.606570LSep 17 · 14:20W. Buczynski3.3011118113K. Slawinski1.27961161WSep 17 · 13:30K. Slawinski1.371111113O. Sokolowski2.703880LSep 17 · 12:20K. Slawinski1.555111111112K. Schaniel2.25115139133LSep 17 · 10:40K. Slawinski1.39181191M. Baron2.6011117113WSep 17 · 09:05W. Glanowski3.3071190K. Slawinski1.251113113WSep 17 · 08:20K. Schaniel2.25911481K. Slawinski1.5511711113LSep 17 · 07:30K. Slawinski1.4611511782O. Sokolowski2.55611211113LSep 17 · 06:20K. Slawinski1.289890W. Buczynski3.151111113WSep 15 · 14:20P. Przewlocki2.009660K. Slawinski1.731111113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.