TT Lossbeater/WTT Champions Macao
WTT Champions MacaoMatch #13089686
Played Sep 8Finished
Anton Kallberg
Home
1.17
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
2–8Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
1210115116––––
Manush Shah
Away
4.50
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 23:00 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeManush Shah to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingAnton Kallberg above · Manush Shah below
Set 1 · 12-10
Set 2 · 11-5
Set 3 · 11-6
Point 55 set 3, 11-6 — our read held Manush Shah at 54.0%
55 points played in total.
H2H Anton Kallberg 1–0 Manush Shah Manush Shah has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 23:00What took a side1 for · 1 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.17 (79%)
Kallberg
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-0 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Form (L5)
Kallberg 20% vs Shah 20%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Kallberg 20% vs Shah 40%
Shah
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Kallberg -1 · Shah -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 79% — Strong (leans Kallberg) · live re-read · sealed at 46% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Kallberg form (20%) is below what odds imply (86%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsKallberg 1.17 / Shah 4.50
Signal prob.79% / 21%
Edge (Kallberg)-0.0pp
WTT Champions Macao · #13089686
Kallberg1.17
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Shah4.50
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomeKallberg1wins
AwayShah0wins
Kallberg leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home1
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away0
This 1 meeting
MetricKallbergShahK − SBasisWins10+1in 1 meetingFirst set10+1of 1Avg pointsper match34.021.0+13.0per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricKallbergShahBasisWin rate · lifetime2 / 10 vs 4 / 1020%40%2 / 10 vs 4 / 10Avg sets wonper match1.21.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
KallbergKallberg 1.17/Shah 4.50
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
79.4%
Kallberg · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Kallberg won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
WSep 8 · 07:05A. Kallberg341211113M. Shah2110560
A. Kallberg10
LSep 13 · 05:15H. Calderano1.40111111114A. Kallberg2.7557870WSep 12 · 10:30A. Kallberg3.4011358114A. Lebrun1.30611111153WSep 10 · 11:40F. Coton2.285470A. Kallberg1.531111113WSep 10 · 10:30F. Coton2.385470A. Kallberg1.531111113LAug 13 · 18:20A. Kallberg2.38121191192Q. Zhou1.53145118103WAug 11 · 16:35V. Sidorenko1.675970A. Kallberg2.101111113LAug 6 · 02:00A. Kallberg2.60118981W. Jang1.4481111113LAug 4 · 02:00A. Kallberg2.63118981W. Jang1.4481111113LJun 29 · 19:00A. Lebrun1.531111133A. Kallberg2.3849110LJun 18 · 16:45A. Kallberg1.129870T. Jarvis5.001111113
M. Shah10
LSep 4 · 06:45M. Shah1.228660D. Ivonin4.001111113WSep 3 · 07:20M. Shah1.201111113L. Volin4.338630LAug 11 · 11:45M. Shah2.2511761182Y. Feng1.57311115113LAug 4 · 02:00M. Shah7.005580A. Lebrun1.081111113LJun 27 · 19:55H. Cifuentes2.631311113M. Shah1.4411760LJun 20 · 09:35H. Calderano1.141011711113M. Shah5.0012811762WJun 20 · 01:55M. Shah—13411113K. Jha—1111681WJun 19 · 15:00M. Shah2.7513411113K. Jha1.401111681WJun 18 · 04:00J. Chen1.251210111392M. Shah3.7510121311113LMay 23 · 15:35J. Oh1.4011135113M. Shah2.757111131
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.