Form at publish
1 – 3
Set by set
Form at publish
Radek Sedlacek to win
55.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
WrongSent to Pro: Tomas Kindl @ 2.00 · Won
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Set 1 · 7-11
Set 2 · 6-11
Set 3 · 11-7
Set 4 · 8-11
Point 72 set 4, 8-11 · our read held Radek Sedlacek at 55.3%
72 points played in total.
H2H Radek Sedlacek 8–5 Tomas Kindl Tomas Kindl has won 5 of their 13 meetings.
Sent to Pro: Tomas Kindl @ 2.00 · Won
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Sent to Pro: Tomas Kindl @ 2.00 · Won
55.3%Our read33.3%to break even at 3.00
clears by 22.0pp33.3% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 3.00 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 0 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 07:53 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded