Form at publish
2 – 3
Set by set
Form at publish
Petr Orlowski to win
68.9%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
Set 1 · 11-13
Set 2 · 6-11
Set 3 · 12-10
Set 4 · 11-9
Set 5 · 4-6
Point 93 set 5, 4-6 · our read held Petr Orlowski at 68.9%
93 points drawn · the score is 12 ahead; the rest land in a moment.
H2H Petr Orlowski 7–3 Tomas Kanka Tomas Kanka has won 3 of their 10 meetings.
68.9%Our read69.3%to break even at 1.444
short by 0.4pp69.3% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.444 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 18:14 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded