Form at publish
3 – 1
Set by set
Form at publish
Jiri Ruzicka to win
68.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
RightSent to Pro: Radim Urbaniec @ 2.75 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Set 1 · 13-11
Set 2 · 6-11
Set 3 · 11-5
Set 4 · 11-4
Point 72 set 4, 11-4 · our read held Jiri Ruzicka at 68.3%
72 points played in total.
H2H Jiri Ruzicka 54–28 Radim Urbaniec Radim Urbaniec has won 28 of their 82 meetings.
Sent to Pro: Radim Urbaniec @ 2.75 · Lost
The Pro pick went the other way, on a re-read before the serve.
Sent to Pro: Radim Urbaniec @ 2.75 · Lost
68.3%Our read71.4%to break even at 1.40
short by 3.1pp71.4% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.40 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 1 silent when this read was sealed. The pick sent to Pro came from a re-read before the serve.
They have already met 2 times today · last one 2h before this match
Urbaniec beat Ruzicka 3-2.
Same-day rematch winners hit ~50% historically. The market typically prices this in, which is why it moves nothing in the read below: it is context, not a signal.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 17:57 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded