Form at publish
2 – 3
Set by set
Form at publish
Jakub Pilch to win
54.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
Set 1 · 11-13
Set 2 · 11-7
Set 3 · 8-11
Set 4 · 11-7
Set 5 · 13-15
Point 107 set 5, 13-15 · our read held Jakub Pilch at 54.1%
107 points played in total.
H2H Jakub Pilch 34–20 Matyas Navedla Matyas Navedla has won 20 of their 54 meetings.
54.1%Our read57.9%to break even at 1.727
short by 3.8pp57.9% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.727 they are the same number)
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 3 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
The fixtures listed above have their reads written and frozen, the same way this one was at 06:23 UTC. They stay hidden until each match finishes: that is the only reason this record can be checked at all.
Today's board · How the record is graded