Milan Klement vs Matej Nohejl 1-3

TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro

Czech Liga ProA12 · Liberec

Played Oct 10Finished

Milan Klement

Home

1.67

At publish

Won last 3

Form at publish

7–3Last 10Won last 3

Final

1 – 3

Set by set

1210611911911––

Matej Nohejl

Away

2.10

At publish

Won last 2

Form at publish

5–5Last 10Won last 2

The read, and what happenedsealed at 07:57 and never touched: 55.8% is still 55.8%

Graded at full time

Milan Klement to win

55.8%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Wrong

not sent

How it is goingMilan Klement above · Matej Nohejl below

Set 1 · 12-10

Set 2 · 6-11

Set 3 · 9-11

Set 4 · 9-11

Point 79 set 4, 9-11 · our read held Milan Klement at 55.8%

79 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 07:57

55.8%Our read60.0%to break even at 1.666

short by 4.2pp

60.0% (what it has to beat, and what the price implies: at 1.666 they are the same number)

What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.67 (56%)

Klement

Wrong

no bar to clear: a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Klement 1658 vs Nohejl 1644

Klement

Wrong

both rated, 14 points apart, no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Klement 80% vs Nohejl 60%

Klement

Wrong

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Klement 70% vs Nohejl 50%

Klement

Wrong

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Klement +3 · Nohejl +2

Klement

Wrong

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing: the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue: the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

5 for, 1 silent, and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 56% · Slight lean (leans Klement) · sealed before the serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Nohejl form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (48%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsKlement 1.666 / Nohejl 2.10

Signal prob.56% / 44%

Edge (Klement)-4.2pp (anti-value)

Czech Liga Pro · #13269553

Klement1.67

70%won 7 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

Won last 3

oldest → newest

40%takes the first set · 4 of 10

As favourite54% won 110 of 204

Up 2–0, closes it89% 56 of 63

Up 1–0, closes it69% 74 of 108

Nohejl2.10

50%won 5 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

Won last 2

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

As underdog44% won 20 of 45

Down 0–1, comes back21% 5 of 24

Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 13

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands: it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricKlementNohejlBasisWin rate · lifetime447 / 877 vs 92 / 18051%51.1%447 / 877 vs 92 / 180Avg sets wonper match2.12.0per matchAvg pointsper match39.537.1per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did: no prediction

Match Winner

Klement

Klement 1.67/Nohejl 2.10

Read onlywould have missed

What we said

55.8%

Klement · sealed before the serve

What happened

1–3

Nohejl won

Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together: one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

M. Klement10