Enio Mendes vs Mauro Scharrer 3-1 — Challenger Series TT

TT Lossbeater/Challenger Series TT

Challenger Series TTMatch #13141669

Played Sep 17Finished

Enio Mendes

Home

1.53

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

3–7Last 10Won last 1

Final

3 – 1

Set by set

118611116115––

Mauro Scharrer

Away

2.38

At publish

Lost last 3

Form at publish

4–6Last 10Lost last 3

The read, and what happenedsealed at 17:39 and never touched — 56.7% is still 56.7%

Graded at full time

Mauro Scharrer to win

56.7%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Wrong

not sent

How it is goingEnio Mendes above · Mauro Scharrer below

Set 1 · 11-8

Set 2 · 6-11

Set 3 · 11-6

Set 4 · 11-5

Point 69 set 4, 11-5 — our read held Mauro Scharrer at 56.7%

69 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 17:39

What took a side1 for · 2 against · 3 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.53 (61%)

Mendes

Correct

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Mendes 1801 vs Scharrer 1593

Mendes

Correct

both rated, 208 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Mendes 40% vs Scharrer 40%

—

Too close

0pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Mendes 30% vs Scharrer 40%

—

Too close

10pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Streak

Mendes +1 · Scharrer -3

Scharrer

Wrong

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

1 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 61% — Slight lean (leans Mendes) · live re-read · sealed at 43% before the first serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Mendes form (40%) is below what odds imply (65%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsMendes 1.53 / Scharrer 2.38

Signal prob.61% / 39%

Edge (Mendes)+0.0pp

Challenger Series TT · #13141669

Mendes1.53

30%won 3 of 10 · last 10

oldest → newest

70%takes the first set · 7 of 10

As favourite79% won 23 of 29

Up 2–0, closes it100% 12 of 12

Up 1–0, closes it84% 16 of 19

Scharrer2.38

40%won 4 of 10 · last 10

Lost last 3

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

As underdog20% won 2 of 10

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricMendesScharrerBasisWin rate · lifetime43 / 62 vs 27 / 5369.4%50.9%43 / 62 vs 27 / 53Avg sets wonper match2.42.0per matchAvg pointsper match37.535.8per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Mendes

Mendes 1.53/Scharrer 2.38

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

60.8%

Mendes · sealed before the serve

What happened

3–1

Mendes won

Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

E. Mendes10